From 63d1e995be455ae9196270eb4b789de21afd42ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 16:03:48 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] x86/topology: Fix Intel HT disable As per the comment in the code; due to BIOS it is sometimes impossible to know if there actually are smp siblings until the machine is fully enumerated. So we rather overestimate the number of possible packages. Fixes: 1f12e32f4cd5 ("x86/topology: Create logical package id") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: aherrmann@suse.com Cc: jencce.kernel@gmail.com Cc: bp@alien8.de Cc: Mike Galbraith Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160318150538.611014173@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c index 64b669dcbf23..81e6a432f23c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c @@ -312,8 +312,21 @@ static void __init smp_init_package_map(void) /* * Today neither Intel nor AMD support heterogenous systems. That * might change in the future.... + * + * While ideally we'd want '* smp_num_siblings' in the below @ncpus + * computation, this won't actually work since some Intel BIOSes + * report inconsistent HT data when they disable HT. + * + * In particular, they reduce the APIC-IDs to only include the cores, + * but leave the CPUID topology to say there are (2) siblings. + * This means we don't know how many threads there will be until + * after the APIC enumeration. + * + * By not including this we'll sometimes over-estimate the number of + * logical packages by the amount of !present siblings, but this is + * still better than MAX_LOCAL_APIC. */ - ncpus = boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores * smp_num_siblings; + ncpus = boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores; __max_logical_packages = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_cpu_ids, ncpus); /* -- 2.20.1