From 61e02c745721a361ba238e70bfa1c84a4df1a4b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Johannes Weiner Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 16:08:16 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: clean up reclaim size variable use in try_charge() Charge reclaim and OOM currently use the charge batch variable, but batching is already disabled at that point. To simplify the charge logic, the batch variable is reset to the original request size when reclaim is entered, so it's functionally equal, but it's misleading. Switch reclaim/OOM to nr_pages, which is the original request size. Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner Cc: Michal Hocko Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/memcontrol.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index a6a062e409eb..90dc501eaf3f 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -2612,7 +2612,7 @@ retry: nr_reclaimed = mem_cgroup_reclaim(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, flags); - if (mem_cgroup_margin(mem_over_limit) >= batch) + if (mem_cgroup_margin(mem_over_limit) >= nr_pages) goto retry; if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY) @@ -2626,7 +2626,7 @@ retry: * unlikely to succeed so close to the limit, and we fall back * to regular pages anyway in case of failure. */ - if (nr_reclaimed && batch <= (1 << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)) + if (nr_reclaimed && nr_pages <= (1 << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)) goto retry; /* * At task move, charge accounts can be doubly counted. So, it's @@ -2644,7 +2644,7 @@ retry: if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) goto bypass; - mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, get_order(batch)); + mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, get_order(nr_pages)); nomem: if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL)) return -ENOMEM; -- 2.20.1