From 5fc894bb4fb1de8373d1d5fb6db19204a16859e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oleg Nesterov Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:52:48 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] signals: send_sigqueue: don't forget about handle_stop_signal() send_group_sigqueue() calls handle_stop_signal(), send_sigqueue() doesn't. This is not consistent and in fact I'd say this is (minor) bug. Move handle_stop_signal() from send_group_sigqueue() to do_send_sigqueue(), the latter is called by send_sigqueue() too. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Roland McGrath Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/signal.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index 0a8b0aece80d..8259262eaa60 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -1274,8 +1274,10 @@ void sigqueue_free(struct sigqueue *q) } static int do_send_sigqueue(int sig, struct sigqueue *q, struct task_struct *t, - struct sigpending *pending) + struct sigpending *pending) { + handle_stop_signal(sig, t); + if (unlikely(!list_empty(&q->list))) { /* * If an SI_TIMER entry is already queue just increment @@ -1335,7 +1337,6 @@ send_group_sigqueue(int sig, struct sigqueue *q, struct task_struct *p) read_lock(&tasklist_lock); /* Since it_lock is held, p->sighand cannot be NULL. */ spin_lock_irqsave(&p->sighand->siglock, flags); - handle_stop_signal(sig, p); ret = do_send_sigqueue(sig, q, p, &p->signal->shared_pending); -- 2.20.1