From 5d92d96a947a5d0d83710d11750bb29a0c1b985d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Namhyung Kim Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:40:03 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] perf sched timehist: Handle zero sample->tid properly Sometimes samples have tid of 0 but non-0 pid. It ends up having a new thread of 0 tid/pid (instead of referring idle task) since tid is used to search matching task. But I guess it's wrong to use 0 as a tid when pid is set. This patch uses tid only if it has a non-zero value or same as pid (of 0). Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: David Ahern Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Minchan Kim Cc: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161206034010.6499-4-namhyung@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c index 634d8cfb4693..c8b3e6c330c3 100644 --- a/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-sched.c @@ -2118,7 +2118,9 @@ static struct thread *timehist_get_thread(struct perf_sched *sched, pr_err("Failed to get idle thread for cpu %d.\n", sample->cpu); } else { - thread = machine__findnew_thread(machine, sample->pid, sample->tid); + /* there were samples with tid 0 but non-zero pid */ + thread = machine__findnew_thread(machine, sample->pid, + sample->tid ?: sample->pid); if (thread == NULL) { pr_debug("Failed to get thread for tid %d. skipping sample.\n", sample->tid); -- 2.20.1