From 5d60d3e7c08a46643e902e39d9743cf394382151 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frederic Weisbecker Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 04:11:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] irq: Improve a bit softirq debugging do_softirq() has a debug check that verifies that it is not nesting on softirqs processing, nor miscounting the softirq part of the preempt count. But making sure that softirqs processing don't nest is actually a more generic concern that applies to any caller of __do_softirq(). Do take it one step further and generalize that debug check to any softirq processing. Acked-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: James Hogan Cc: James E.J. Bottomley Cc: Helge Deller Cc: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Heiko Carstens Cc: David S. Miller Cc: Andrew Morton --- kernel/softirq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c index 17c5cd2e3dae..9f8092b82a94 100644 --- a/kernel/softirq.c +++ b/kernel/softirq.c @@ -133,7 +133,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(local_bh_disable); static void __local_bh_enable(unsigned int cnt) { - WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq()); WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled()); if (softirq_count() == cnt) @@ -148,6 +147,7 @@ static void __local_bh_enable(unsigned int cnt) */ void _local_bh_enable(void) { + WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq()); __local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET); } @@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ restart: account_irq_exit_time(current); __local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_OFFSET); + WARN_ON_ONCE(in_interrupt()); tsk_restore_flags(current, old_flags, PF_MEMALLOC); } @@ -299,7 +300,6 @@ asmlinkage void do_softirq(void) if (pending) do_softirq_own_stack(); - WARN_ON_ONCE(softirq_count()); local_irq_restore(flags); } -- 2.20.1