From 58ec4152895b96f047dcf5e490ee49b4c574dec3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michal Ludvig Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 08:14:58 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] [CRYPTO] padlock-sha: TFMs don't need to be static TFMs are local variables. No need to declare them static. After all one is enough. Signed-off-by: Michal Ludvig Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu --- drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.c b/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.c index 95e9971d1a7..b028db61c30 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/padlock-sha.c @@ -262,28 +262,28 @@ static struct crypto_alg sha256_alg = { static void __init padlock_sha_check_fallbacks(void) { - static struct crypto_tfm *tfm_sha1, *tfm_sha256; + struct crypto_tfm *tfm; /* We'll try to allocate one TFM for each fallback * to test that the modules are available. */ - tfm_sha1 = crypto_alloc_tfm(sha1_fallback, 0); - if (!tfm_sha1) { + tfm = crypto_alloc_tfm(sha1_fallback, 0); + if (!tfm) { printk(KERN_WARNING PFX "Couldn't load fallback module for '%s'. Tried '%s'.\n", sha1_alg.cra_name, sha1_fallback); } else { printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX "Fallback for '%s' is driver '%s' (prio=%d)\n", sha1_alg.cra_name, - crypto_tfm_alg_driver_name(tfm_sha1), crypto_tfm_alg_priority(tfm_sha1)); - crypto_free_tfm(tfm_sha1); + crypto_tfm_alg_driver_name(tfm), crypto_tfm_alg_priority(tfm)); + crypto_free_tfm(tfm); } - tfm_sha256 = crypto_alloc_tfm(sha256_fallback, 0); - if (!tfm_sha256) { + tfm = crypto_alloc_tfm(sha256_fallback, 0); + if (!tfm) { printk(KERN_WARNING PFX "Couldn't load fallback module for '%s'. Tried '%s'.\n", sha256_alg.cra_name, sha256_fallback); } else { printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX "Fallback for '%s' is driver '%s' (prio=%d)\n", sha256_alg.cra_name, - crypto_tfm_alg_driver_name(tfm_sha256), crypto_tfm_alg_priority(tfm_sha256)); - crypto_free_tfm(tfm_sha256); + crypto_tfm_alg_driver_name(tfm), crypto_tfm_alg_priority(tfm)); + crypto_free_tfm(tfm); } } -- 2.20.1