From 54fdd80f6fe430381e6eeeef8894eb72b657d649 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yuval Mintz Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:11:16 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] qed: PF to reply to unknown messages If a future VF would send the PF an unknown message, the PF today would not send a reply. This would have 2 bad effects: a. VF would have to timeout on the request. b. If VF were to send an additional message to PF, firmware would mark it as malicious. Instead, if there's some valid reply-address on the message - let the PF answer and tell the VF it doesn't know the message. Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_sriov.c | 33 ++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_sriov.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_sriov.c index c20437387c19..4d161c751c12 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_sriov.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_sriov.c @@ -2857,7 +2857,6 @@ static void qed_iov_process_mbx_req(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn, { struct qed_iov_vf_mbx *mbx; struct qed_vf_info *p_vf; - int i; p_vf = qed_iov_get_vf_info(p_hwfn, (u16) vfid, true); if (!p_vf) @@ -2866,9 +2865,8 @@ static void qed_iov_process_mbx_req(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn, mbx = &p_vf->vf_mbx; /* qed_iov_process_mbx_request */ - DP_VERBOSE(p_hwfn, - QED_MSG_IOV, - "qed_iov_process_mbx_req vfid %d\n", p_vf->abs_vf_id); + DP_VERBOSE(p_hwfn, QED_MSG_IOV, + "VF[%02x]: Processing mailbox message\n", p_vf->abs_vf_id); mbx->first_tlv = mbx->req_virt->first_tlv; @@ -2922,15 +2920,28 @@ static void qed_iov_process_mbx_req(struct qed_hwfn *p_hwfn, * support them. Or this may be because someone wrote a crappy * VF driver and is sending garbage over the channel. */ - DP_ERR(p_hwfn, - "unknown TLV. type %d length %d. first 20 bytes of mailbox buffer:\n", - mbx->first_tlv.tl.type, mbx->first_tlv.tl.length); - - for (i = 0; i < 20; i++) { + DP_NOTICE(p_hwfn, + "VF[%02x]: unknown TLV. type %04x length %04x padding %08x reply address %llu\n", + p_vf->abs_vf_id, + mbx->first_tlv.tl.type, + mbx->first_tlv.tl.length, + mbx->first_tlv.padding, mbx->first_tlv.reply_address); + + /* Try replying in case reply address matches the acquisition's + * posted address. + */ + if (p_vf->acquire.first_tlv.reply_address && + (mbx->first_tlv.reply_address == + p_vf->acquire.first_tlv.reply_address)) { + qed_iov_prepare_resp(p_hwfn, p_ptt, p_vf, + mbx->first_tlv.tl.type, + sizeof(struct pfvf_def_resp_tlv), + PFVF_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED); + } else { DP_VERBOSE(p_hwfn, QED_MSG_IOV, - "%x ", - mbx->req_virt->tlv_buf_size.tlv_buffer[i]); + "VF[%02x]: Can't respond to TLV - no valid reply address\n", + p_vf->abs_vf_id); } } } -- 2.20.1