From 54d00f6069d921bfe83344cb94e2dd7cb54531ef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@cesarb.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 20:37:10 -0200
Subject: [PATCH] firmware: use noinline_for_stack

The comment above fw_file_size() suggests it is noinline for stack size
reasons. Use noinline_for_stack to make this more clear.

Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@cesarb.net>
Acked-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
---
 drivers/base/firmware_class.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
index 8945f4e489ed..620b876f939f 100644
--- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
+++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static const char *fw_path[] = {
 };
 
 /* Don't inline this: 'struct kstat' is biggish */
-static noinline long fw_file_size(struct file *file)
+static noinline_for_stack long fw_file_size(struct file *file)
 {
 	struct kstat st;
 	if (vfs_getattr(file->f_path.mnt, file->f_path.dentry, &st))
-- 
2.20.1