From 533445c6e53368569e50ab3fb712230c03d523f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Omar Sandoval Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 03:09:36 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] sched/core: Fix regression in cpuset_cpu_inactive() for suspend Commit 3c18d447b3b3 ("sched/core: Check for available DL bandwidth in cpuset_cpu_inactive()"), a SCHED_DEADLINE bugfix, had a logic error that caused a regression in setting a CPU inactive during suspend. I ran into this when a program was failing pthread_setaffinity_np() with EINVAL after a suspend+wake up. A simple reproducer: $ ./a.out sched_setaffinity: Success $ systemctl suspend $ ./a.out sched_setaffinity: Invalid argument ... where ./a.out is: #define _GNU_SOURCE #include #include #include #include #include #include int main(void) { long num_cores; cpu_set_t cpu_set; int ret; num_cores = sysconf(_SC_NPROCESSORS_ONLN); CPU_ZERO(&cpu_set); CPU_SET(num_cores - 1, &cpu_set); errno = 0; ret = sched_setaffinity(getpid(), sizeof(cpu_set), &cpu_set); perror("sched_setaffinity"); return ret ? EXIT_FAILURE : EXIT_SUCCESS; } The mistake is that suspend is handled in the action == CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN case of the switch statement in cpuset_cpu_inactive(). However, the commit in question masked out CPU_TASKS_FROZEN from the action, making this case dead. The fix is straightforward. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Juri Lelli Cc: Thomas Gleixner Fixes: 3c18d447b3b3 ("sched/core: Check for available DL bandwidth in cpuset_cpu_inactive()") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1cb5ecb3d6543c38cce5790387f336f54ec8e2bc.1430733960.git.osandov@osandov.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/core.c | 28 ++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index 34db9bf892a3..57bd333bc4ab 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -6999,27 +6999,23 @@ static int cpuset_cpu_inactive(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, unsigned long flags; long cpu = (long)hcpu; struct dl_bw *dl_b; + bool overflow; + int cpus; - switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) { + switch (action) { case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE: - /* explicitly allow suspend */ - if (!(action & CPU_TASKS_FROZEN)) { - bool overflow; - int cpus; - - rcu_read_lock_sched(); - dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu); + rcu_read_lock_sched(); + dl_b = dl_bw_of(cpu); - raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags); - cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu); - overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, 0); - raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&dl_b->lock, flags); + cpus = dl_bw_cpus(cpu); + overflow = __dl_overflow(dl_b, cpus, 0, 0); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dl_b->lock, flags); - rcu_read_unlock_sched(); + rcu_read_unlock_sched(); - if (overflow) - return notifier_from_errno(-EBUSY); - } + if (overflow) + return notifier_from_errno(-EBUSY); cpuset_update_active_cpus(false); break; case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE_FROZEN: -- 2.20.1