From 4f6789cad6472a09200a60928ef6c56ae457ed38 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 15:37:59 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] uprobes: Use synchronize_rcu() not synchronize_sched() commit 016f8ffc48cb01d1e7701649c728c5d2e737d295 upstream. While debugging another bug, I was looking at all the synchronize*() functions being used in kernel/trace, and noticed that trace_uprobes was using synchronize_sched(), with a comment to synchronize with {u,ret}_probe_trace_func(). When looking at those functions, the data is protected with "rcu_read_lock()" and not with "rcu_read_lock_sched()". This is using the wrong synchronize_*() function. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180809160553.469e1e32@gandalf.local.home Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 70ed91c6ec7f8 ("tracing/uprobes: Support ftrace_event_file base multibuffer") Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c index 7197ff9f0bbd..ea0d90a31fc9 100644 --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c @@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ probe_event_disable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct trace_event_file *file) list_del_rcu(&link->list); /* synchronize with u{,ret}probe_trace_func */ - synchronize_sched(); + synchronize_rcu(); kfree(link); if (!list_empty(&tu->tp.files)) -- 2.20.1