From 4be89a34609659042ef0bf883ad76388fb5251bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jianyu Zhan Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:10:38 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: use DIV_ROUND_UP for calculation of zone's balance_gap and correct comments. Currently, we use (zone->managed_pages + KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO-1) / KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO to avoid a zero gap value. It's better to use DIV_ROUND_UP macro for neater code and clear meaning. Besides, the gap value is calculated against the per-zone "managed pages", not "present pages". This patch also corrects the comment and do some rephrasing. Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan Acked-by: Rik van Riel Acked-by: Rafael Aquini Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- include/linux/swap.h | 8 ++++---- mm/vmscan.c | 10 ++++------ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h index 4348d95e571f..4bdbee80eede 100644 --- a/include/linux/swap.h +++ b/include/linux/swap.h @@ -166,10 +166,10 @@ enum { #define COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX /* - * Ratio between the present memory in the zone and the "gap" that - * we're allowing kswapd to shrink in addition to the per-zone high - * wmark, even for zones that already have the high wmark satisfied, - * in order to provide better per-zone lru behavior. We are ok to + * Ratio between zone->managed_pages and the "gap" that above the per-zone + * "high_wmark". While balancing nodes, We allow kswapd to shrink zones that + * do not meet the (high_wmark + gap) watermark, even which already met the + * high_wmark, in order to provide better per-zone lru behavior. We are ok to * spend not more than 1% of the memory for this zone balancing "gap". */ #define KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO 100 diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 494cd632178c..cc29fca8d989 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -2295,9 +2295,8 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc) * there is a buffer of free pages available to give compaction * a reasonable chance of completing and allocating the page */ - balance_gap = min(low_wmark_pages(zone), - (zone->managed_pages + KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO-1) / - KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO); + balance_gap = min(low_wmark_pages(zone), DIV_ROUND_UP( + zone->managed_pages, KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO)); watermark = high_wmark_pages(zone) + balance_gap + (2UL << sc->order); watermark_ok = zone_watermark_ok_safe(zone, 0, watermark, 0, 0); @@ -2949,9 +2948,8 @@ static bool kswapd_shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, * high wmark plus a "gap" where the gap is either the low * watermark or 1% of the zone, whichever is smaller. */ - balance_gap = min(low_wmark_pages(zone), - (zone->managed_pages + KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO-1) / - KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO); + balance_gap = min(low_wmark_pages(zone), DIV_ROUND_UP( + zone->managed_pages, KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO)); /* * If there is no low memory pressure or the zone is balanced then no -- 2.20.1