From 4923abf9f1a4c1864af438a57c1f3686548230e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:16:49 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Don't warn about order-1 allocations with __GFP_NOFAIL Traditionally, we never failed small orders (even regardless of any __GFP_NOFAIL flags), and slab will allocate order-1 allocations even for small allocations that could fit in a single page (in order to avoid excessive fragmentation). Maybe we should remove this warning entirely, but before making that judgement, at least limit it to bigger allocations. Acked-by: Pekka Enberg Cc: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- mm/page_alloc.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c index aecc9cdfdfce..5d714f8fb303 100644 --- a/mm/page_alloc.c +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c @@ -1153,10 +1153,10 @@ again: * properly detect and handle allocation failures. * * We most definitely don't want callers attempting to - * allocate greater than single-page units with + * allocate greater than order-1 page units with * __GFP_NOFAIL. */ - WARN_ON_ONCE(order > 0); + WARN_ON_ONCE(order > 1); } spin_lock_irqsave(&zone->lock, flags); page = __rmqueue(zone, order, migratetype); -- 2.20.1