From 490154bc68d15de9e38fbb850fe470e32cc66407 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Masami Hiramatsu Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:01:35 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] kprobes/x86: Make boostable flag boolean Make arch_specific_insn.boostable to boolean, since it has only 2 states, boostable or not. So it is better to use boolean from the viewpoint of code readability. Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli Cc: Andrey Ryabinin Cc: Anil S Keshavamurthy Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Brian Gerst Cc: David S . Miller Cc: Denys Vlasenko Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ye Xiaolong Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/149076368566.22469.6322906866458231844.stgit@devbox Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h | 7 +++---- arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 12 ++++++------ arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h index 200581691c6e..34b984c60790 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h @@ -72,14 +72,13 @@ struct arch_specific_insn { /* copy of the original instruction */ kprobe_opcode_t *insn; /* - * boostable = -1: This instruction type is not boostable. - * boostable = 0: This instruction type is boostable. - * boostable = 1: This instruction has been boosted: we have + * boostable = false: This instruction type is not boostable. + * boostable = true: This instruction has been boosted: we have * added a relative jump after the instruction copy in insn, * so no single-step and fixup are needed (unless there's * a post_handler or break_handler). */ - int boostable; + bool boostable; bool if_modifier; }; diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c index a654054eae7e..3f084a0ca722 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c @@ -409,9 +409,9 @@ static void prepare_boost(struct kprobe *p, int length) * jumps back to correct address. */ synthesize_reljump(p->ainsn.insn + length, p->addr + length); - p->ainsn.boostable = 1; + p->ainsn.boostable = true; } else { - p->ainsn.boostable = -1; + p->ainsn.boostable = false; } } @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ void arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) void arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) { if (p->ainsn.insn) { - free_insn_slot(p->ainsn.insn, (p->ainsn.boostable == 1)); + free_insn_slot(p->ainsn.insn, p->ainsn.boostable); p->ainsn.insn = NULL; } } @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ static void setup_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs, return; #if !defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT) - if (p->ainsn.boostable == 1 && !p->post_handler) { + if (p->ainsn.boostable && !p->post_handler) { /* Boost up -- we can execute copied instructions directly */ if (!reenter) reset_current_kprobe(); @@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ static void resume_execution(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs, case 0xcf: case 0xea: /* jmp absolute -- ip is correct */ /* ip is already adjusted, no more changes required */ - p->ainsn.boostable = 1; + p->ainsn.boostable = true; goto no_change; case 0xe8: /* call relative - Fix return addr */ *tos = orig_ip + (*tos - copy_ip); @@ -884,7 +884,7 @@ static void resume_execution(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs, * jmp near and far, absolute indirect * ip is correct. And this is boostable */ - p->ainsn.boostable = 1; + p->ainsn.boostable = true; goto no_change; } default: diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c index 5f8f0b3cc674..041f7b6dfa0f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c @@ -94,6 +94,6 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_ftrace_handler); int arch_prepare_kprobe_ftrace(struct kprobe *p) { p->ainsn.insn = NULL; - p->ainsn.boostable = -1; + p->ainsn.boostable = false; return 0; } -- 2.20.1