From 47cee541a46a73b20dc279bf4c4690f776f6c81b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pavel Emelyanov Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 20:00:37 +0400 Subject: [PATCH] nfsd: safer initialization order in find_file() The alloc_init_file() first adds a file to the hash and then initializes its fi_inode, fi_id and fi_had_conflict. The uninitialized fi_inode could thus be erroneously checked by the find_file(), so move the hash insertion lower. The client_mutex should prevent this race in practice; however, we eventually hope to make less use of the client_mutex, so the ordering here is an accident waiting to happen. I didn't find whether the same can be true for two other fields, but the common sense tells me it's better to initialize an object before putting it into a global hash table :) Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields --- fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c index 84b0fe9a262..296eded356b 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c @@ -1757,12 +1757,12 @@ alloc_init_file(struct inode *ino) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fp->fi_hash); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fp->fi_stateids); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fp->fi_delegations); - spin_lock(&recall_lock); - list_add(&fp->fi_hash, &file_hashtbl[hashval]); - spin_unlock(&recall_lock); fp->fi_inode = igrab(ino); fp->fi_id = current_fileid++; fp->fi_had_conflict = false; + spin_lock(&recall_lock); + list_add(&fp->fi_hash, &file_hashtbl[hashval]); + spin_unlock(&recall_lock); return fp; } return NULL; -- 2.20.1