From 46c52c28deb38df19b1284468792fb59e6a6c27b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sudip Mukherjee Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:17:34 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] spi: lm70llp: use dev_warn As we have a struct device available it is better to use dev_warn() instead of printk. Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c | 7 +++---- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c b/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c index ef829081abd7..cb2284475385 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c @@ -249,9 +249,8 @@ static void spi_lm70llp_attach(struct parport *p) */ status = spi_bitbang_start(&pp->bitbang); if (status < 0) { - printk(KERN_WARNING - "%s: spi_bitbang_start failed with status %d\n", - DRVNAME, status); + dev_warn(&pd->dev, "spi_bitbang_start failed with status %d\n", + status); goto out_off_and_release; } @@ -278,7 +277,7 @@ static void spi_lm70llp_attach(struct parport *p) dev_dbg(&pp->spidev_lm70->dev, "spidev_lm70 at %s\n", dev_name(&pp->spidev_lm70->dev)); else { - printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: spi_new_device failed\n", DRVNAME); + dev_warn(&pd->dev, "spi_new_device failed\n"); status = -ENODEV; goto out_bitbang_stop; } -- 2.20.1