From 45dabf1427a0a876f733b07239ade1bdb0e06010 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Li Zefan Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 13:30:23 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] sh: fix seq_file memory leak When using single_open(), single_release() should be used instead of seq_release(), otherwise there is a memory leak. Signed-off-by: Li Zefan Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt --- arch/sh/mm/cache-debugfs.c | 2 +- arch/sh/mm/pmb.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/cache-debugfs.c b/arch/sh/mm/cache-debugfs.c index c5b56d52b7d2..0e189ccd4a77 100644 --- a/arch/sh/mm/cache-debugfs.c +++ b/arch/sh/mm/cache-debugfs.c @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static const struct file_operations cache_debugfs_fops = { .open = cache_debugfs_open, .read = seq_read, .llseek = seq_lseek, - .release = seq_release, + .release = single_release, }; static int __init cache_debugfs_init(void) diff --git a/arch/sh/mm/pmb.c b/arch/sh/mm/pmb.c index 46911bcbf17b..cef727669c87 100644 --- a/arch/sh/mm/pmb.c +++ b/arch/sh/mm/pmb.c @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static const struct file_operations pmb_debugfs_fops = { .open = pmb_debugfs_open, .read = seq_read, .llseek = seq_lseek, - .release = seq_release, + .release = single_release, }; static int __init pmb_debugfs_init(void) -- 2.20.1