From 45c0a33d0ff12d984e9dc1982271237f27bb943f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Davidlohr Bueso Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 09:49:54 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] sched/rt: Fix rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP warning [ Upstream commit d29a20645d5e929aa7e8616f28e5d8e1c49263ec ] While running rt-tests' pi_stress program I got the following splat: rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP WARNING: CPU: 27 PID: 0 at kernel/sched/sched.h:960 assert_clock_updated.isra.38.part.39+0x13/0x20 [...] enqueue_top_rt_rq+0xf4/0x150 ? cpufreq_dbs_governor_start+0x170/0x170 sched_rt_rq_enqueue+0x65/0x80 sched_rt_period_timer+0x156/0x360 ? sched_rt_rq_enqueue+0x80/0x80 __hrtimer_run_queues+0xfa/0x260 hrtimer_interrupt+0xcb/0x220 smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x62/0x120 apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 [...] do_idle+0x183/0x1e0 cpu_startup_entry+0x5f/0x70 start_secondary+0x192/0x1d0 secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0 We can get rid of it be the "traditional" means of adding an update_rq_clock() call after acquiring the rq->lock in do_sched_rt_period_timer(). The case for the RT task throttling (which this workload also hits) can be ignored in that the skip_update call is actually bogus and quite the contrary (the request bits are removed/reverted). By setting RQCF_UPDATED we really don't care if the skip is happening or not and will therefore make the assert_clock_updated() check happy. Change-Id: I12014f33e599de5a35f39dd742555a2f99403b20 Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180402164954.16255-1-dave@stgolabs.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- kernel/sched/rt.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c index bea7bef36667..e466d6c670be 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c @@ -941,6 +941,8 @@ static int do_sched_rt_period_timer(struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b, int overrun) continue; raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); + update_rq_clock(rq); + if (rt_rq->rt_time) { u64 runtime; -- 2.20.1