From 45a5c8bad827ebb9c9798becc15bce2e804d49e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dhaval Giani Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 03:15:44 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] sched: Add USER_SCHED to feature removal list Peter Zijlstra suggested that we remove USER_SCHED at: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/21/67 Removing USER_SCHED removes a lot of code from the scheduler and simplifies the code. We already have the ability to do user based classification which is tightened using PAM in userspace. Schedule USER_SCHED for removal in 2.6.34 Signed-off-by: Dhaval Giani Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Balbir Singh Cc: Bharata B Rao Cc: Serge E. Hallyn Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri LKML-Reference: <20091103214544.GI5495@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt index bc693fffabe0..f613df8ec7bf 100644 --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt @@ -6,6 +6,21 @@ be removed from this file. --------------------------- +What: USER_SCHED +When: 2.6.34 + +Why: USER_SCHED was implemented as a proof of concept for group scheduling. + The effect of USER_SCHED can already be achieved from userspace with + the help of libcgroup. The removal of USER_SCHED will also simplify + the scheduler code with the removal of one major ifdef. There are also + issues USER_SCHED has with USER_NS. A decision was taken not to fix + those and instead remove USER_SCHED. Also new group scheduling + features will not be implemented for USER_SCHED. + +Who: Dhaval Giani + +--------------------------- + What: PRISM54 When: 2.6.34 -- 2.20.1