From 4580b30ea887fc27e57dabd56724ca24d936dc8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Kara Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 11:44:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] quota: Do not dirty bad dquots Currently we mark dirty even dquots that are not active (i.e., initialization or reading failed for them). Thus later we have to check whether dirty dquot is really active and just clear the dirty bit if not. Avoid this complication by just never marking non-active dquot as dirty. Signed-off-by: Jan Kara --- fs/quota/dquot.c | 15 +++++++-------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/quota/dquot.c b/fs/quota/dquot.c index e1a155e8db15..0393581fe1a3 100644 --- a/fs/quota/dquot.c +++ b/fs/quota/dquot.c @@ -339,6 +339,9 @@ int dquot_mark_dquot_dirty(struct dquot *dquot) { int ret = 1; + if (!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags)) + return 0; + /* If quota is dirty already, we don't have to acquire dq_list_lock */ if (test_bit(DQ_MOD_B, &dquot->dq_flags)) return 1; @@ -624,11 +627,9 @@ int dquot_writeback_dquots(struct super_block *sb, int type) while (!list_empty(dirty)) { dquot = list_first_entry(dirty, struct dquot, dq_dirty); - /* Dirty and inactive can be only bad dquot... */ - if (!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags)) { - clear_dquot_dirty(dquot); - continue; - } + + WARN_ON(!test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags)); + /* Now we have active dquot from which someone is * holding reference so we can safely just increase * use count */ @@ -759,7 +760,7 @@ we_slept: return; } /* Need to release dquot? */ - if (test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags) && dquot_dirty(dquot)) { + if (dquot_dirty(dquot)) { spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock); /* Commit dquot before releasing */ ret = dquot->dq_sb->dq_op->write_dquot(dquot); @@ -777,8 +778,6 @@ we_slept: } goto we_slept; } - /* Clear flag in case dquot was inactive (something bad happened) */ - clear_dquot_dirty(dquot); if (test_bit(DQ_ACTIVE_B, &dquot->dq_flags)) { spin_unlock(&dq_list_lock); dquot->dq_sb->dq_op->release_dquot(dquot); -- 2.20.1