From 449e8df39d3f94a69deae8341f157f6ef5999015 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 15:39:07 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] memblock: Add debug markers at the end of the array Since we allocate one more than needed, why not do a bit of sanity checking here to ensure we don't walk past the end of the array ? Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt --- mm/memblock.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c index 3c474502d92b..a925866e1455 100644 --- a/mm/memblock.c +++ b/mm/memblock.c @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include struct memblock memblock; @@ -112,6 +113,10 @@ void __init memblock_init(void) memblock.reserved.regions = memblock_reserved_init_regions; memblock.reserved.max = INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS; + /* Write a marker in the unused last array entry */ + memblock.memory.regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS].base = (phys_addr_t)RED_INACTIVE; + memblock.reserved.regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS].base = (phys_addr_t)RED_INACTIVE; + /* Create a dummy zero size MEMBLOCK which will get coalesced away later. * This simplifies the memblock_add() code below... */ @@ -131,6 +136,12 @@ void __init memblock_analyze(void) { int i; + /* Check marker in the unused last array entry */ + WARN_ON(memblock_memory_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS].base + != (phys_addr_t)RED_INACTIVE); + WARN_ON(memblock_reserved_init_regions[INIT_MEMBLOCK_REGIONS].base + != (phys_addr_t)RED_INACTIVE); + memblock.memory_size = 0; for (i = 0; i < memblock.memory.cnt; i++) -- 2.20.1