From 419d4741ce108a56ce59e9dc064730af59b7e843 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 19:56:51 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ide-tape: make function name more accurate idetape_active_next_stage() was rather ambiguous wrt its purpose. Make that more explicit and remove superfluous comment. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz --- drivers/ide/ide-tape.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c index 2d4d28271101..8b9da8bb5cce 100644 --- a/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c +++ b/drivers/ide/ide-tape.c @@ -846,10 +846,7 @@ static void idetape_analyze_error(ide_drive_t *drive, u8 *sense) } } -/* - * idetape_active_next_stage will declare the next stage as "active". - */ -static void idetape_active_next_stage (ide_drive_t *drive) +static void idetape_activate_next_stage(ide_drive_t *drive) { idetape_tape_t *tape = drive->driver_data; idetape_stage_t *stage = tape->next_stage; @@ -1040,7 +1037,7 @@ static int idetape_end_request(ide_drive_t *drive, int uptodate, int nr_sects) } } if (tape->next_stage != NULL) { - idetape_active_next_stage(drive); + idetape_activate_next_stage(drive); /* * Insert the next request into the request queue. @@ -2414,7 +2411,7 @@ static void idetape_insert_pipeline_into_queue (ide_drive_t *drive) return; if (!idetape_pipeline_active(tape)) { set_bit(IDETAPE_PIPELINE_ACTIVE, &tape->flags); - idetape_active_next_stage(drive); + idetape_activate_next_stage(drive); (void) ide_do_drive_cmd(drive, tape->active_data_request, ide_end); } } -- 2.20.1