From 3fd80cddc6af5ba53244514a61450d4b30a9fb9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Layton Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 12:13:09 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] locks: report l_pid as -1 for FL_FILE_PVT locks FL_FILE_PVT locks are no longer tied to a particular pid, and are instead inheritable by child processes. Report a l_pid of '-1' for these sorts of locks since the pid is somewhat meaningless for them. This precedent comes from FreeBSD. There, POSIX and flock() locks can conflict with one another. If fcntl(F_GETLK, ...) returns a lock set with flock() then the l_pid member cannot be a process ID because the lock is not held by a process as such. Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton --- fs/locks.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index 0e1f0df8de12..57f1d5fc876a 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c @@ -1864,7 +1864,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfs_test_lock); static int posix_lock_to_flock(struct flock *flock, struct file_lock *fl) { - flock->l_pid = fl->fl_pid; + flock->l_pid = IS_FILE_PVT(fl) ? -1 : fl->fl_pid; #if BITS_PER_LONG == 32 /* * Make sure we can represent the posix lock via @@ -1886,7 +1886,7 @@ static int posix_lock_to_flock(struct flock *flock, struct file_lock *fl) #if BITS_PER_LONG == 32 static void posix_lock_to_flock64(struct flock64 *flock, struct file_lock *fl) { - flock->l_pid = fl->fl_pid; + flock->l_pid = IS_FILE_PVT(fl) ? -1 : fl->fl_pid; flock->l_start = fl->fl_start; flock->l_len = fl->fl_end == OFFSET_MAX ? 0 : fl->fl_end - fl->fl_start + 1; -- 2.20.1