From 36225b9170ea7b25371063364721ed96b2a58f97 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 11:03:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] crypto: marvell - be explicit about destination in mv_cesa_dma_add_op() The mv_cesa_dma_add_op() function builds a mv_cesa_tdma_desc structure to copy the operation description to the SRAM, but doesn't explicitly initialize the destination of the copy. It works fine because the operatin description must be copied at the beginning of the SRAM, and the mv_cesa_tdma_desc structure is initialized to zero when allocated. However, it is somewhat confusing to not have a destination defined. Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu --- drivers/crypto/marvell/tdma.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/crypto/marvell/tdma.c b/drivers/crypto/marvell/tdma.c index 86a065bcc187..9fd7a5fbaa1b 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/marvell/tdma.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/marvell/tdma.c @@ -261,6 +261,7 @@ struct mv_cesa_op_ctx *mv_cesa_dma_add_op(struct mv_cesa_tdma_chain *chain, tdma->op = op; tdma->byte_cnt = cpu_to_le32(size | BIT(31)); tdma->src = cpu_to_le32(dma_handle); + tdma->dst = CESA_SA_CFG_SRAM_OFFSET; tdma->flags = CESA_TDMA_DST_IN_SRAM | CESA_TDMA_OP; return op; -- 2.20.1