From 361b8482026c926997b1d3d5a045bc9f5bc02b16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lucas Stach Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 09:49:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix multiblock reads on i.MX53 The eSDHC controller on the i.MX53 needs an additional, non spec compliant CMD12 after a multiblock read with a predefined number of blocks. Otherwise the internal state machine won't go back to the idle state. This commit effectively reverts 5b6b0ad6 (mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix for mmc cards on i.MX5), which fixed part of the problem by making multiblock reads work, however this fix was not sufficient when multi- and singleblock reads got intermixed. This implements the recommended workaround (Freescale i.MX Reference Manual, section 29.6.8 "Multi-block Read") by manually sending a CMD12 with the RSPTYP bits cleared. Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach Signed-off-by: Chris Ball --- drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c index 9b0a0a91ea0a..d5f0d59e1310 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c @@ -85,6 +85,12 @@ struct pltfm_imx_data { struct clk *clk_ipg; struct clk *clk_ahb; struct clk *clk_per; + enum { + NO_CMD_PENDING, /* no multiblock command pending*/ + MULTIBLK_IN_PROCESS, /* exact multiblock cmd in process */ + WAIT_FOR_INT, /* sent CMD12, waiting for response INT */ + } multiblock_status; + }; static struct platform_device_id imx_esdhc_devtype[] = { @@ -154,6 +160,8 @@ static inline void esdhc_clrset_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 mask, u32 val, i static u32 esdhc_readl_le(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg) { + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host); + struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv; u32 val = readl(host->ioaddr + reg); if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_CAPABILITIES)) { @@ -175,6 +183,18 @@ static u32 esdhc_readl_le(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg) val &= ~ESDHC_INT_VENDOR_SPEC_DMA_ERR; val |= SDHCI_INT_ADMA_ERROR; } + + /* + * mask off the interrupt we get in response to the manually + * sent CMD12 + */ + if ((imx_data->multiblock_status == WAIT_FOR_INT) && + ((val & SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE) == SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE)) { + val &= ~SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE; + writel(SDHCI_INT_RESPONSE, host->ioaddr + + SDHCI_INT_STATUS); + imx_data->multiblock_status = NO_CMD_PENDING; + } } return val; @@ -211,6 +231,15 @@ static void esdhc_writel_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 val, int reg) v = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC); v &= ~ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC_SDIO_QUIRK; writel(v, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC); + + if (imx_data->multiblock_status == MULTIBLK_IN_PROCESS) + { + /* send a manual CMD12 with RESPTYP=none */ + data = MMC_STOP_TRANSMISSION << 24 | + SDHCI_CMD_ABORTCMD << 16; + writel(data, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_TRANSFER_MODE); + imx_data->multiblock_status = WAIT_FOR_INT; + } } if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_INT_ENABLE || reg == SDHCI_SIGNAL_ENABLE)) { @@ -277,11 +306,13 @@ static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg) } return; case SDHCI_COMMAND: - if ((host->cmd->opcode == MMC_STOP_TRANSMISSION || - host->cmd->opcode == MMC_SET_BLOCK_COUNT) && - (imx_data->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_MULTIBLK_NO_INT)) + if (host->cmd->opcode == MMC_STOP_TRANSMISSION) val |= SDHCI_CMD_ABORTCMD; + if ((host->cmd->opcode == MMC_SET_BLOCK_COUNT) && + (imx_data->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_MULTIBLK_NO_INT)) + imx_data->multiblock_status = MULTIBLK_IN_PROCESS; + if (is_imx6q_usdhc(imx_data)) writel(val << 16, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_TRANSFER_MODE); -- 2.20.1