From 34093d055e09d1bb549efc11c8d448373437bbe4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Julien Brunel Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 02:40:48 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] net/rxrpc: Use an IS_ERR test rather than a NULL test In case of error, the function rxrpc_get_transport returns an ERR pointer, but never returns a NULL pointer. So after a call to this function, a NULL test should be replaced by an IS_ERR test. A simplified version of the semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/) // @correct_null_test@ expression x,E; statement S1, S2; @@ x = rxrpc_get_transport(...) <... when != x = E if ( ( - x@p2 != NULL + ! IS_ERR ( x ) | - x@p2 == NULL + IS_ERR( x ) ) ) S1 else S2 ...> ? x = E; // Signed-off-by: Julien Brunel Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/rxrpc/ar-accept.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-accept.c b/net/rxrpc/ar-accept.c index bdfb77417794..77228f28fa36 100644 --- a/net/rxrpc/ar-accept.c +++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-accept.c @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static int rxrpc_accept_incoming_call(struct rxrpc_local *local, trans = rxrpc_get_transport(local, peer, GFP_NOIO); rxrpc_put_peer(peer); - if (!trans) { + if (IS_ERR(trans)) { _debug("no trans"); ret = -EBUSY; goto error; -- 2.20.1