From 3403ccc0c9f069c40ea751a93ac6746f5ef2116a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Chinner Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 09:27:49 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] xfs: inode lockdep annotations broke non-lockdep build Fix CONFIG_LOCKDEP=n build, because asserts I put in to ensure we aren't overrunning lockdep subclasses in commit 0952c81 ("xfs: clean up inode lockdep annotations") use a define that doesn't exist when CONFIG_LOCKDEP=n Only check the subclass limits when lockdep is actually enabled. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner --- fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c index 65792660b043..aa00ccc0bd78 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c @@ -362,6 +362,17 @@ int xfs_lots_retries; int xfs_lock_delays; #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP +static bool +xfs_lockdep_subclass_ok( + int subclass) +{ + return subclass < MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES; +} +#else +#define xfs_lockdep_subclass_ok(subclass) (true) +#endif + /* * Bump the subclass so xfs_lock_inodes() acquires each lock with a different * value. This can be called for any type of inode lock combination, including @@ -375,11 +386,12 @@ xfs_lock_inumorder(int lock_mode, int subclass) ASSERT(!(lock_mode & (XFS_ILOCK_PARENT | XFS_ILOCK_RTBITMAP | XFS_ILOCK_RTSUM))); + ASSERT(xfs_lockdep_subclass_ok(subclass)); if (lock_mode & (XFS_IOLOCK_SHARED|XFS_IOLOCK_EXCL)) { ASSERT(subclass <= XFS_IOLOCK_MAX_SUBCLASS); - ASSERT(subclass + XFS_IOLOCK_PARENT_VAL < - MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASSES); + ASSERT(xfs_lockdep_subclass_ok(subclass + + XFS_IOLOCK_PARENT_VAL)); class += subclass << XFS_IOLOCK_SHIFT; if (lock_mode & XFS_IOLOCK_PARENT) class += XFS_IOLOCK_PARENT_VAL << XFS_IOLOCK_SHIFT; -- 2.20.1