From 27720e75a7a1597252a81dadcd178331c83af861 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Insu Yun Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:04:47 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] keys: Be more consistent in selection of union members used key->description and key->index_key.description are same because they are unioned. But, for readability, using same name for duplication and validation seems better. Signed-off-by: Insu Yun Signed-off-by: David Howells --- security/keys/key.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/security/keys/key.c b/security/keys/key.c index aee2ec5a18fc..c0478465d1ac 100644 --- a/security/keys/key.c +++ b/security/keys/key.c @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ struct key *key_alloc(struct key_type *type, const char *desc, key->index_key.desc_len = desclen; key->index_key.description = kmemdup(desc, desclen + 1, GFP_KERNEL); - if (!key->description) + if (!key->index_key.description) goto no_memory_3; atomic_set(&key->usage, 1); -- 2.20.1