From 252026ab9382b5204b7ccd152863a49ae7408656 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Norris Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 01:03:33 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mtd: nand: lpc32xx_slc: don't call nand_default_bbt directly This driver is doing some strange logic here. If it doesn't have flash-based BBT enabled, it allows nand_scan_tail() to scan the BBT. But if it is using flash-based BBT, it tells nand_scan_tail() to skip scanning, then it immediately calls the default BBT scanning function itself. As I read it, this logic is equivalent to the default nand_scan_tail() behavior without interfering with NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN or calling nand_default_bbt() directly at all. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris --- drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_slc.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_slc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_slc.c index add75709d415..6d5f8c515436 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_slc.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/lpc32xx_slc.c @@ -893,7 +893,6 @@ static int lpc32xx_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) /* Avoid extra scan if using BBT, setup BBT support */ if (host->ncfg->use_bbt) { - chip->options |= NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN; chip->bbt_options |= NAND_BBT_USE_FLASH; /* @@ -915,13 +914,6 @@ static int lpc32xx_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) goto err_exit3; } - /* Standard layout in FLASH for bad block tables */ - if (host->ncfg->use_bbt) { - if (nand_default_bbt(mtd) < 0) - dev_err(&pdev->dev, - "Error initializing default bad block tables\n"); - } - mtd->name = "nxp_lpc3220_slc"; ppdata.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node; res = mtd_device_parse_register(mtd, NULL, &ppdata, host->ncfg->parts, -- 2.20.1