From 23b08e97f2c0d68c2a46a11e4fd8a4686d7351ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:04:08 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] fs/9p: Workaround vfs rename rehash bug This is similar to what ceph, ocfs2 and nfs does http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-fsdevel/2008/4/18/1498534 May be we should get vfs fixed Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V Signed-off-by: Venkateswararao Jujjuri Signed-off-by: Eric Van Hensbergen --- fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c index c072bb97e957..8e9d60345bc8 100644 --- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c @@ -884,6 +884,11 @@ clunk_newdir: clear_nlink(new_inode); else drop_nlink(new_inode); + /* + * Work around vfs rename rehash bug with + * FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE + */ + v9fs_invalidate_inode_attr(new_inode); } if (S_ISDIR(old_inode->i_mode)) { if (!new_inode) -- 2.20.1