From 1deaf9d19776916cd1c83191503bf327319a301a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:16:56 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] fs/notify/inode_mark.c: use list_next_entry in
 fsnotify_unmount_inodes

To make the intention clearer, use list_next_entry instead of
list_entry.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 fs/notify/inode_mark.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/notify/inode_mark.c b/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
index e785fd954c30..741077deef3b 100644
--- a/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
+++ b/fs/notify/inode_mark.c
@@ -199,8 +199,7 @@ void fsnotify_unmount_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
 				break;
 			}
 			spin_unlock(&next_i->i_lock);
-			next_i = list_entry(next_i->i_sb_list.next,
-						struct inode, i_sb_list);
+			next_i = list_next_entry(next_i, i_sb_list);
 		}
 
 		/*
-- 
2.20.1