From 1d4a7f1c4faf53eb9e822743ec8a70b3019a26d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:39:29 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] hrtimers: fix inconsistent lock state on resume in hres_timers_resume Andrey Borzenkov reported this lockdep assert: > [17854.688347] ================================= > [17854.688347] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ] > [17854.688347] 2.6.29-rc2-1avb #1 > [17854.688347] --------------------------------- > [17854.688347] inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage. > [17854.688347] pm-suspend/18240 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes: > [17854.688347] (&cpu_base->lock){++..}, at: [] retrigger_next_event+0x5c/0xa0 > [17854.688347] {in-hardirq-W} state was registered at: > [17854.688347] [] __lock_acquire+0x79d/0x1930 > [17854.688347] [] lock_acquire+0x5c/0x80 > [17854.688347] [] _spin_lock+0x35/0x70 > [17854.688347] [] hrtimer_run_queues+0x31/0x140 > [17854.688347] [] run_local_timers+0x8/0x20 > [17854.688347] [] update_process_times+0x23/0x60 > [17854.688347] [] tick_periodic+0x24/0x80 > [17854.688347] [] tick_handle_periodic+0x12/0x70 > [17854.688347] [] timer_interrupt+0x14/0x20 > [17854.688347] [] handle_IRQ_event+0x29/0x60 > [17854.688347] [] handle_level_irq+0x69/0xe0 > [17854.688347] [] 0xffffffff > [17854.688347] irq event stamp: 55771 > [17854.688347] hardirqs last enabled at (55771): [] _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60 > [17854.688347] hardirqs last disabled at (55770): [] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x19/0x80 > [17854.688347] softirqs last enabled at (54836): [] __do_softirq+0xc4/0x110 > [17854.688347] softirqs last disabled at (54831): [] do_softirq+0x8e/0xe0 > [17854.688347] > [17854.688347] other info that might help us debug this: > [17854.688347] 3 locks held by pm-suspend/18240: > [17854.688347] #0: (&buffer->mutex){--..}, at: [] sysfs_write_file+0x25/0x100 > [17854.688347] #1: (pm_mutex){--..}, at: [] enter_state+0x4f/0x140 > [17854.688347] #2: (dpm_list_mtx){--..}, at: [] device_pm_lock+0xf/0x20 > [17854.688347] > [17854.688347] stack backtrace: > [17854.688347] Pid: 18240, comm: pm-suspend Not tainted 2.6.29-rc2-1avb #1 > [17854.688347] Call Trace: > [17854.688347] [] ? printk+0x18/0x20 > [17854.688347] [] print_usage_bug+0x16c/0x1d0 > [17854.688347] [] mark_lock+0x8bf/0xc90 > [17854.688347] [] ? pit_next_event+0x2f/0x40 > [17854.688347] [] __lock_acquire+0x580/0x1930 > [17854.688347] [] ? _spin_unlock+0x1d/0x20 > [17854.688347] [] ? pit_next_event+0x2f/0x40 > [17854.688347] [] ? clockevents_program_event+0x98/0x160 > [17854.688347] [] ? mark_held_locks+0x48/0x90 > [17854.688347] [] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60 > [17854.688347] [] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x139/0x190 > [17854.688347] [] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10 > [17854.688347] [] lock_acquire+0x5c/0x80 > [17854.688347] [] ? retrigger_next_event+0x5c/0xa0 > [17854.688347] [] _spin_lock+0x35/0x70 > [17854.688347] [] ? retrigger_next_event+0x5c/0xa0 > [17854.688347] [] retrigger_next_event+0x5c/0xa0 > [17854.688347] [] hres_timers_resume+0xa/0x10 > [17854.688347] [] timekeeping_resume+0xee/0x150 > [17854.688347] [] __sysdev_resume+0x14/0x50 > [17854.688347] [] sysdev_resume+0x47/0x80 > [17854.688347] [] device_power_up+0xb/0x20 > [17854.688347] [] suspend_devices_and_enter+0xcf/0x150 > [17854.688347] [] ? freeze_processes+0x3f/0x90 > [17854.688347] [] enter_state+0xf4/0x140 > [17854.688347] [] state_store+0x7d/0xc0 > [17854.688347] [] ? state_store+0x0/0xc0 > [17854.688347] [] kobj_attr_store+0x24/0x30 > [17854.688347] [] sysfs_write_file+0x9c/0x100 > [17854.688347] [] vfs_write+0x9c/0x160 > [17854.688347] [] ? restore_nocheck_notrace+0x0/0xe > [17854.688347] [] ? sysfs_write_file+0x0/0x100 > [17854.688347] [] sys_write+0x3d/0x70 > [17854.688347] [] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x31 Andrey's analysis: > timekeeping_resume() is called via class ->resume > method; and according to comments in sysdev_resume() and > device_power_up(), they are called with interrupts disabled. > > Looking at suspend_enter, irqs *are* disabled at this point. > > So it actually looks like something (may be some driver) > unconditionally enabled irqs in resume path. Add a debug check to test this theory. If it triggers then it triggers because the resume code calls it with irqs enabled, which is a no-no not just for timekeeping_resume(), but also bad for a number of other resume handlers. Reported-by: Andrey Borzenkov Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/hrtimer.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c index 1455b7651b6b..cb83c6d4c07c 100644 --- a/kernel/hrtimer.c +++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c @@ -614,7 +614,9 @@ void clock_was_set(void) */ void hres_timers_resume(void) { - /* Retrigger the CPU local events: */ + WARN_ONCE(!irqs_disabled(), + KERN_INFO "hres_timers_resume() called with IRQs enabled!"); + retrigger_next_event(NULL); } -- 2.20.1