From 1c98aa7424ff163637d8321674ec58dee28152d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:09:20 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fix quilt merge error in acpi-cpufreq.c We ended up incorrectly using '&cur' instead of '&readin' in the work_on_cpu() -> smp_call_function_single() transformation in commit 01599fca6758d2cd133e78f87426fc851c9ea725 ("cpufreq: use smp_call_function_[single|many]() in acpi-cpufreq.c"). Andrew explains: "OK, the acpi tree went and had conflicting changes merged into it after I'd written the patch and it appears that I incorrectly reverted part of 18b2646fe3babeb40b34a0c1751e0bf5adfdc64c while fixing the resulting rejects. Switching it to `readin' looks correct." Acked-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c index 3e3cd3db7a0c..837c2c4cc203 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c @@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static unsigned int get_measured_perf(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int perf_percent; unsigned int retval; - if (smp_call_function_single(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &cur, 1)) + if (smp_call_function_single(cpu, read_measured_perf_ctrs, &readin, 1)) return 0; cur.aperf.whole = readin.aperf.whole - -- 2.20.1