From 1a1c0ffb2adb2d2ce7bb9c4dfd2935ba345cf2c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiri Olsa Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2014 14:59:48 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] perf tools: Add +field argument support for --sort option Adding support to add field(s) to default sort order via using the '+' prefix, like for report: $ perf report Samples: 2K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 882172583 Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol 7.39% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] intel_idle 1.97% firefox libpthread-2.17.so [.] pthread_mutex_lock 1.39% firefox [snd_hda_intel] [k] azx_get_position 1.11% firefox libpthread-2.17.so [.] pthread_mutex_unlock $ perf report -s +cpu Samples: 2K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 882172583 Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol CPU 2.89% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] intel_idle 000 2.61% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] intel_idle 002 1.20% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] intel_idle 001 0.82% firefox libpthread-2.17.so [.] pthread_mutex_lock 002 Works in general for commands using --sort option. v2 with changes suggested: - Use dynamic memory instead static buffer - Fix error message typo Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Acked-by: Namhyung Kim Cc: Corey Ashford Cc: David Ahern Cc: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Jean Pihet Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140823125948.GA1193@krava.brq.redhat.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/util/sort.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/sort.c b/tools/perf/util/sort.c index 1958637cf136..289df9d1e65a 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/sort.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/sort.c @@ -1446,12 +1446,47 @@ static const char *get_default_sort_order(void) return default_sort_orders[sort__mode]; } +static int setup_sort_order(void) +{ + char *new_sort_order; + + /* + * Append '+'-prefixed sort order to the default sort + * order string. + */ + if (!sort_order || is_strict_order(sort_order)) + return 0; + + if (sort_order[1] == '\0') { + error("Invalid --sort key: `+'"); + return -EINVAL; + } + + /* + * We allocate new sort_order string, but we never free it, + * because it's checked over the rest of the code. + */ + if (asprintf(&new_sort_order, "%s,%s", + get_default_sort_order(), sort_order + 1) < 0) { + error("Not enough memory to set up --sort"); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + sort_order = new_sort_order; + return 0; +} + static int __setup_sorting(void) { char *tmp, *tok, *str; - const char *sort_keys = sort_order; + const char *sort_keys; int ret = 0; + ret = setup_sort_order(); + if (ret) + return ret; + + sort_keys = sort_order; if (sort_keys == NULL) { if (is_strict_order(field_order)) { /* -- 2.20.1