From 17b7a89cfb6ea2ff103785f9b2580e5138b6cfd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:30:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Suspend: Clean up suspend_64.c There's a freakishly long comment in suspend_64.c, shorten it. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Acked-by: Pavel Machek Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Len Brown --- arch/x86/kernel/suspend_64.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/suspend_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/suspend_64.c index 09199511c256..7ac7130022f1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/suspend_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/suspend_64.c @@ -140,7 +140,12 @@ static void fix_processor_context(void) int cpu = smp_processor_id(); struct tss_struct *t = &per_cpu(init_tss, cpu); - set_tss_desc(cpu,t); /* This just modifies memory; should not be necessary. But... This is necessary, because 386 hardware has concept of busy TSS or some similar stupidity. */ + /* + * This just modifies memory; should not be necessary. But... This + * is necessary, because 386 hardware has concept of busy TSS or some + * similar stupidity. + */ + set_tss_desc(cpu, t); get_cpu_gdt_table(cpu)[GDT_ENTRY_TSS].type = 9; @@ -160,7 +165,6 @@ static void fix_processor_context(void) loaddebug(¤t->thread, 6); loaddebug(¤t->thread, 7); } - } #ifdef CONFIG_HIBERNATION -- 2.20.1