From 16092b5cccd6f3a8d1957ca004c97947e07018db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Juuso Oikarinen Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 09:49:59 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] wl1271: Improve command polling In testing I noticed that the wl1271 commands fall into two categories. In the first category are "fast" commands, these mostly take only 0 or 1 polls to complete, but occasionally upto 50 (giving a 0.5ms execution time.) In the second category, the command completion takes well more than 0.5ms (from 1.5ms upwards.) This patch fixes command polling such that it is optimal for the fast commands, but also allows sleep for the longer ones. Signed-off-by: Juuso Oikarinen Reviewed-by: Luciano Coelho Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho Signed-off-by: John W. Linville --- drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_cmd.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_cmd.c b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_cmd.c index b19090334bc0..564526d81279 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_cmd.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl12xx/wl1271_cmd.c @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ #include "wl1271_cmd.h" #include "wl1271_event.h" -#define WL1271_CMD_POLL_COUNT 5 +#define WL1271_CMD_FAST_POLL_COUNT 50 /* * send command to firmware @@ -76,11 +76,11 @@ int wl1271_cmd_send(struct wl1271 *wl, u16 id, void *buf, size_t len, goto out; } - udelay(10); poll_count++; - if (poll_count == WL1271_CMD_POLL_COUNT) - wl1271_info("cmd polling took over %d cycles", - poll_count); + if (poll_count < WL1271_CMD_FAST_POLL_COUNT) + udelay(10); + else + msleep(1); intr = wl1271_read32(wl, ACX_REG_INTERRUPT_NO_CLEAR); } -- 2.20.1