From 1513b02c8b537af275ea74fdfb380c618b9e6778 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 16:03:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ext3 uses rb_node = NULL; to zero rb_root.
The problem with this is that 17d9ddc72fb8bba0d4f678 ("rbtree: Add support
for augmented rbtrees") in the linux-next tree adds a new field to that
struct which needs to be NULLas well. This patch uses RB_ROOT as the
intializer so all of the relevant fields will be NULL'd.
Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext3/dir.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext3/dir.c b/fs/ext3/dir.c
index 373fa90c796a..e2e72c367cf6 100644
--- a/fs/ext3/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ext3/dir.c
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ static void free_rb_tree_fname(struct rb_root *root)
kfree (old);
}
if (!parent)
- root->rb_node = NULL;
+ *root = RB_ROOT;
else if (parent->rb_left == n)
parent->rb_left = NULL;
else if (parent->rb_right == n)
--
2.20.1