From 14a3f40aafacde1dfd6912327ae14df4baf10304 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arjan van de Ven Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 07:31:01 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] x86: Remove STACKPROTECTOR_ALL STACKPROTECTOR_ALL has a really high overhead (runtime and stack footprint) and is not really worth it protection wise (the normal STACKPROTECTOR is in effect for all functions with buffers already), so lets just remove the option entirely. Reported-by: Dave Jones Reported-by: Chuck Ebbert Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Eric Sandeen LKML-Reference: <20091023073101.3dce4ebb@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/Kconfig | 4 ---- arch/x86/Makefile | 1 - 2 files changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig index 07e01149e3bf..72ace9515a07 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig @@ -1443,12 +1443,8 @@ config SECCOMP If unsure, say Y. Only embedded should say N here. -config CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL - bool - config CC_STACKPROTECTOR bool "Enable -fstack-protector buffer overflow detection (EXPERIMENTAL)" - select CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL ---help--- This option turns on the -fstack-protector GCC feature. This feature puts, at the beginning of functions, a canary value on diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile index a012ee8ef803..d2d24c9ee64d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/Makefile +++ b/arch/x86/Makefile @@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR cc_has_sp := $(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_$(BITS)-has-stack-protector.sh ifeq ($(shell $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(cc_has_sp) $(CC) $(biarch)),y) stackp-y := -fstack-protector - stackp-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL) += -fstack-protector-all KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(stackp-y) else $(warning stack protector enabled but no compiler support) -- 2.20.1