From 13ef11110fa2173b9d03e6616574914e12e2a90f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Teigland Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:18:18 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] dlm: fix waiter recovery An outstanding remote operation (an lkb on the "waiter" list) could sometimes miss being resent during recovery. The decision was based on the lkb_nodeid field, which could have changed during an earlier aborted recovery, so it no longer represents the actual remote destination. The lkb_wait_nodeid is always the actual remote node, so it is the best value to use. Signed-off-by: David Teigland --- fs/dlm/lock.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c index 4c58d4a3adc4..3d35c593f4c1 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/lock.c +++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c @@ -4187,15 +4187,19 @@ static void recover_convert_waiter(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, /* A waiting lkb needs recovery if the master node has failed, or the master node is changing (only when no directory is used) */ -static int waiter_needs_recovery(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb) +static int waiter_needs_recovery(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, + int dir_nodeid) { - if (dlm_is_removed(ls, lkb->lkb_nodeid)) + if (dlm_is_removed(ls, lkb->lkb_wait_nodeid)) return 1; if (!dlm_no_directory(ls)) return 0; - if (dlm_dir_nodeid(lkb->lkb_resource) != lkb->lkb_nodeid) + if (dir_nodeid == dlm_our_nodeid()) + return 1; + + if (dir_nodeid != lkb->lkb_wait_nodeid) return 1; return 0; @@ -4212,6 +4216,7 @@ void dlm_recover_waiters_pre(struct dlm_ls *ls) struct dlm_lkb *lkb, *safe; struct dlm_message *ms_stub; int wait_type, stub_unlock_result, stub_cancel_result; + int dir_nodeid; ms_stub = kmalloc(sizeof(struct dlm_message), GFP_KERNEL); if (!ms_stub) { @@ -4223,13 +4228,21 @@ void dlm_recover_waiters_pre(struct dlm_ls *ls) list_for_each_entry_safe(lkb, safe, &ls->ls_waiters, lkb_wait_reply) { + dir_nodeid = dlm_dir_nodeid(lkb->lkb_resource); + /* exclude debug messages about unlocks because there can be so many and they aren't very interesting */ if (lkb->lkb_wait_type != DLM_MSG_UNLOCK) { - log_debug(ls, "recover_waiter %x nodeid %d " - "msg %d to %d", lkb->lkb_id, lkb->lkb_nodeid, - lkb->lkb_wait_type, lkb->lkb_wait_nodeid); + log_debug(ls, "waiter %x remote %x msg %d r_nodeid %d " + "lkb_nodeid %d wait_nodeid %d dir_nodeid %d", + lkb->lkb_id, + lkb->lkb_remid, + lkb->lkb_wait_type, + lkb->lkb_resource->res_nodeid, + lkb->lkb_nodeid, + lkb->lkb_wait_nodeid, + dir_nodeid); } /* all outstanding lookups, regardless of destination will be @@ -4240,7 +4253,7 @@ void dlm_recover_waiters_pre(struct dlm_ls *ls) continue; } - if (!waiter_needs_recovery(ls, lkb)) + if (!waiter_needs_recovery(ls, lkb, dir_nodeid)) continue; wait_type = lkb->lkb_wait_type; @@ -4373,8 +4386,11 @@ int dlm_recover_waiters_post(struct dlm_ls *ls) ou = is_overlap_unlock(lkb); err = 0; - log_debug(ls, "recover_waiter %x nodeid %d msg %d r_nodeid %d", - lkb->lkb_id, lkb->lkb_nodeid, mstype, r->res_nodeid); + log_debug(ls, "waiter %x remote %x msg %d r_nodeid %d " + "lkb_nodeid %d wait_nodeid %d dir_nodeid %d " + "overlap %d %d", lkb->lkb_id, lkb->lkb_remid, mstype, + r->res_nodeid, lkb->lkb_nodeid, lkb->lkb_wait_nodeid, + dlm_dir_nodeid(r), oc, ou); /* At this point we assume that we won't get a reply to any previous op or overlap op on this lock. First, do a big @@ -4426,9 +4442,12 @@ int dlm_recover_waiters_post(struct dlm_ls *ls) } } - if (err) - log_error(ls, "recover_waiters_post %x %d %x %d %d", - lkb->lkb_id, mstype, lkb->lkb_flags, oc, ou); + if (err) { + log_error(ls, "waiter %x msg %d r_nodeid %d " + "dir_nodeid %d overlap %d %d", + lkb->lkb_id, mstype, r->res_nodeid, + dlm_dir_nodeid(r), oc, ou); + } unlock_rsb(r); put_rsb(r); dlm_put_lkb(lkb); -- 2.20.1