From 12e993b89464707398e4209bd99983e376454985 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 17:23:00 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] x86-32: fix up strncpy_from_user() sign error The 'max' range needs to be unsigned, since the size of the user address space is bigger than 2GB. We know that 'count' is positive in 'long' (that is checked in the caller), so we will truncate 'max' down to something that fits in a signed long, but before we actually do that, that comparison needs to be done in unsigned. Bug introduced in commit 92ae03f2ef99 ("x86: merge 32/64-bit versions of 'strncpy_from_user()' and speed it up"). On x86-64 you can't trigger this, since the user address space is much smaller than 63 bits, and on x86-32 it works in practice, since you would seldom hit the strncpy limits anyway. I had actually tested the corner-cases, I had only tested them on x86-64. Besides, I had only worried about the case of a pointer *close* to the end of the address space, rather than really far away from it ;) This also changes the "we hit the user-specified maximum" to return 'res', for the trivial reason that gcc seems to generate better code that way. 'res' and 'count' are the same in that case, so it really doesn't matter which one we return. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c index 57252c928f56..d6ae30bbd7bb 100644 --- a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c +++ b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy.c @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static inline unsigned long count_bytes(unsigned long mask) * hit it), 'max' is the address space maximum (and we return * -EFAULT if we hit it). */ -static inline long do_strncpy_from_user(char *dst, const char __user *src, long count, long max) +static inline long do_strncpy_from_user(char *dst, const char __user *src, long count, unsigned long max) { long res = 0; @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static inline long do_strncpy_from_user(char *dst, const char __user *src, long * too? If so, that's ok - we got as much as the user asked for. */ if (res >= count) - return count; + return res; /* * Nope: we hit the address space limit, and we still had more -- 2.20.1