From 10fa1155a2c3282f421a74fedfad1957e8bdc86c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 23:49:37 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] uml: fix unreasonably long udelay Currently we have a confused udelay implementation. * __const_udelay does not accept usecs but xloops in i386 and x86_64 * our implementation requires usecs as arg * it gets a xloops count when called by asm/arch/delay.h Bugs related to this (extremely long shutdown times) where reported by some x86_64 users, especially using Device Mapper. To hit this bug, a compile-time constant time parameter must be passed - that's why UML seems to work most times. Fix this with a simple udelay implementation. Signed-off-by: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso Acked-by: Jeff Dike Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- arch/um/sys-i386/delay.c | 11 ----------- arch/um/sys-x86_64/delay.c | 11 ----------- include/asm-um/delay.h | 17 ++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/um/sys-i386/delay.c b/arch/um/sys-i386/delay.c index 2c11b9770e8b..d623e074f41d 100644 --- a/arch/um/sys-i386/delay.c +++ b/arch/um/sys-i386/delay.c @@ -27,14 +27,3 @@ void __udelay(unsigned long usecs) } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__udelay); - -void __const_udelay(unsigned long usecs) -{ - int i, n; - - n = (loops_per_jiffy * HZ * usecs) / MILLION; - for(i=0;i 20000) ? \ + __bad_udelay() : __udelay(n)) + +/* It appears that ndelay is not used at all for UML, and has never been + * implemented. */ +extern void __unimplemented_ndelay(void); +#define ndelay(n) __unimplemented_ndelay() + #endif -- 2.20.1