From 0996905f9301c2ff4c021982c42a15b35e74bf1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Trond Myklebust Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:44:38 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] lockd: posix_test_lock() should not call locks_copy_lock() The caller of posix_test_lock() should never need to look at the lock private data, so do not copy that information. This also means that there is no need to call the fl_release_private methods. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- fs/locks.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index 231b23c12c3d..c83b5dbe0ed9 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c @@ -239,17 +239,25 @@ static void locks_copy_private(struct file_lock *new, struct file_lock *fl) /* * Initialize a new lock from an existing file_lock structure. */ -void locks_copy_lock(struct file_lock *new, struct file_lock *fl) +static void __locks_copy_lock(struct file_lock *new, const struct file_lock *fl) { - locks_release_private(new); - new->fl_owner = fl->fl_owner; new->fl_pid = fl->fl_pid; - new->fl_file = fl->fl_file; + new->fl_file = NULL; new->fl_flags = fl->fl_flags; new->fl_type = fl->fl_type; new->fl_start = fl->fl_start; new->fl_end = fl->fl_end; + new->fl_ops = NULL; + new->fl_lmops = NULL; +} + +void locks_copy_lock(struct file_lock *new, struct file_lock *fl) +{ + locks_release_private(new); + + __locks_copy_lock(new, fl); + new->fl_file = fl->fl_file; new->fl_ops = fl->fl_ops; new->fl_lmops = fl->fl_lmops; @@ -686,7 +694,7 @@ posix_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl, break; } if (cfl) { - locks_copy_lock(conflock, cfl); + __locks_copy_lock(conflock, cfl); unlock_kernel(); return 1; } -- 2.20.1