From 0752ba807b04ccd69cb4bc8bbf829a80ee208a3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeff Layton Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2016 07:30:43 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] locks: don't check for race with close when setting OFD lock We don't clean out OFD locks on close(), so there's no need to check for a race with them here. They'll get cleaned out at the same time that flock locks are. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton Acked-by: "J. Bruce Fields" --- fs/locks.c | 16 ++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index c263aff793bc..e72077d5a664 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c @@ -2219,10 +2219,12 @@ int fcntl_setlk(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, error = do_lock_file_wait(filp, cmd, file_lock); /* - * Attempt to detect a close/fcntl race and recover by - * releasing the lock that was just acquired. + * Attempt to detect a close/fcntl race and recover by releasing the + * lock that was just acquired. There is no need to do that when we're + * unlocking though, or for OFD locks. */ - if (!error && file_lock->fl_type != F_UNLCK) { + if (!error && file_lock->fl_type != F_UNLCK && + !(file_lock->fl_flags & FL_OFDLCK)) { /* * We need that spin_lock here - it prevents reordering between * update of i_flctx->flc_posix and check for it done in @@ -2361,10 +2363,12 @@ int fcntl_setlk64(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, error = do_lock_file_wait(filp, cmd, file_lock); /* - * Attempt to detect a close/fcntl race and recover by - * releasing the lock that was just acquired. + * Attempt to detect a close/fcntl race and recover by releasing the + * lock that was just acquired. There is no need to do that when we're + * unlocking though, or for OFD locks. */ - if (!error && file_lock->fl_type != F_UNLCK) { + if (!error && file_lock->fl_type != F_UNLCK && + !(file_lock->fl_flags & FL_OFDLCK)) { /* * We need that spin_lock here - it prevents reordering between * update of i_flctx->flc_posix and check for it done in -- 2.20.1