From 072256d1f2b8ba0bbb265d590c703f3d57a39d6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Veaceslav Falico Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 15:33:22 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] bonding: make slave status notifications GFP_ATOMIC Currently we're using GFP_KERNEL, however there are some path(s) where we can hold some spinlocks, specifically bond->curr_slave_lock: [ 4.722916] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:965 [ 4.724438] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 940, name: ifup-eth [ 4.726034] 5 locks held by ifup-eth/940: ...snip... [ 4.734646] #4: (&bond->curr_slave_lock){+...+.}, at: [] bond_enslave+0xda6/0xdd0 [bonding] ...snip... [ 4.759081] [] bond_change_active_slave+0x191/0x3b0 [bonding] [ 4.760917] [] bond_select_active_slave+0xf7/0x1d0 [bonding] [ 4.762751] [] bond_enslave+0xdae/0xdd0 [bonding] ...snip... As it's out of hot path and is a really rare event - change the gfp_t flags to GFP_ATOMIC to avoid sleeping under spinlock. v2: convert new notify calls to GFP_ATOMIC. CC: Thomas Glanzmann CC: Ding Tianhong CC: Jay Vosburgh CC: Andy Gospodarek Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h index b7127a1ba2c9..63ee116adfab 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static inline void bond_set_active_slave(struct slave *slave) { if (slave->backup) { slave->backup = 0; - rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, slave->dev, 0, GFP_KERNEL); + rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, slave->dev, 0, GFP_ATOMIC); } } @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ static inline void bond_set_backup_slave(struct slave *slave) { if (!slave->backup) { slave->backup = 1; - rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, slave->dev, 0, GFP_KERNEL); + rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, slave->dev, 0, GFP_ATOMIC); } } @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static inline void bond_set_slave_state(struct slave *slave, slave->backup = slave_state; if (notify) { - rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, slave->dev, 0, GFP_KERNEL); + rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, slave->dev, 0, GFP_ATOMIC); slave->should_notify = 0; } else { if (slave->should_notify) @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static inline void bond_slave_state_notify(struct bonding *bond) bond_for_each_slave(bond, tmp, iter) { if (tmp->should_notify) { - rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, tmp->dev, 0, GFP_KERNEL); + rtmsg_ifinfo(RTM_NEWLINK, tmp->dev, 0, GFP_ATOMIC); tmp->should_notify = 0; } } -- 2.20.1