From 06fffb1267c9d986687b69d74a46ee332a50575e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:52:38 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] do_task_stat: don't take rcu_read_lock() lock_task_sighand() was changed, and do_task_stat() doesn't need rcu_read_lock any longer. sighand->siglock protects all "interesting" fields. Except: it doesn't protect ->tty->pgrp, but neither does rcu_read_lock(), this should be fixed. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@sw.ru> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> --- fs/proc/array.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/array.c b/fs/proc/array.c index 07d6c4853fe8..b07a71002f2f 100644 --- a/fs/proc/array.c +++ b/fs/proc/array.c @@ -425,7 +425,6 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns, cutime = cstime = utime = stime = cputime_zero; cgtime = gtime = cputime_zero; - rcu_read_lock(); if (lock_task_sighand(task, &flags)) { struct signal_struct *sig = task->signal; @@ -469,7 +468,6 @@ static int do_task_stat(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns, unlock_task_sighand(task, &flags); } - rcu_read_unlock(); if (!whole || num_threads < 2) wchan = get_wchan(task); -- 2.20.1