From 060e82c6f4ccf678decffb28ba8301ca9220a995 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris Wilson Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 06:29:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Remove redundant list_empty(eb->vmas) tests in execbuffer Part of the pre-validation for an execbuffer call is that there is at least one object in the execlist. As we bail if we fail to lookup any object, we can be sure that after the eb_lookup_vma() there is at least one object in the vma list and so we do not need to assert. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: Ben Widawsky Cc: Daniel Vetter Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c index 446f4b6fbefe..6c07940b468c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c @@ -622,9 +622,6 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_reserve(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, bool has_fenced_gpu_access = INTEL_INFO(ring->dev)->gen < 4; int retry; - if (list_empty(vmas)) - return 0; - i915_gem_retire_requests_ring(ring); vm = list_first_entry(vmas, struct i915_vma, exec_list)->vm; @@ -725,9 +722,6 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_relocate_slow(struct drm_device *dev, int i, total, ret; unsigned count = args->buffer_count; - if (WARN_ON(list_empty(&eb->vmas))) - return 0; - vm = list_first_entry(&eb->vmas, struct i915_vma, exec_list)->vm; /* We may process another execbuffer during the unlock... */ -- 2.20.1