From 05bd92dddc595d74ea645e793c1f3bd4b1fc251a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shaun Tancheff Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:32:13 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] block: missing bio_put following submit_bio_wait submit_bio_wait() gives the caller an opportunity to examine struct bio and so expects the caller to issue the put_bio() This fixes a memory leak reported by a few people in 4.7-rc2 kmemleak report after 9082e87bfbf8 ("block: remove struct bio_batch") Signed-off-by: Shaun Tancheff Tested-by: Catalin Marinas Tested-by: Larry Finger@lwfinger.net Tested-by: David Drysdale Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe --- block/blk-lib.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c index 23d7f301a196..9e29dc351695 100644 --- a/block/blk-lib.c +++ b/block/blk-lib.c @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, ret = submit_bio_wait(type, bio); if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) ret = 0; + bio_put(bio); } blk_finish_plug(&plug); @@ -165,8 +166,10 @@ int blkdev_issue_write_same(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, } } - if (bio) + if (bio) { ret = submit_bio_wait(REQ_WRITE | REQ_WRITE_SAME, bio); + bio_put(bio); + } return ret != -EOPNOTSUPP ? ret : 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_issue_write_same); @@ -206,8 +209,11 @@ static int __blkdev_issue_zeroout(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, } } - if (bio) - return submit_bio_wait(WRITE, bio); + if (bio) { + ret = submit_bio_wait(WRITE, bio); + bio_put(bio); + return ret; + } return 0; } -- 2.20.1