From 03bc10ab5b0f9b8f81bffbe6e40c944f9d3dbcc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Boris Brezillon Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 03:48:48 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] clk: check ->determine/round_rate() return value in clk_calc_new_rates ->determine_rate() and ->round_rate() can return the closest rate to the requested one or an error code. clk_calc_new_rates is assuming these functions can't return a negative value, which leads to a undefined behavior when the clk implementation returns such an error code. Fix this by returning NULL in case ->determine_rate() or ->round_rate() returned an error code. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon Signed-off-by: Michael Turquette --- drivers/clk/clk.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index fa5a00e5ee41..459ce9da13e0 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c @@ -1618,6 +1618,7 @@ static struct clk_core *clk_calc_new_rates(struct clk_core *clk, unsigned long min_rate; unsigned long max_rate; int p_index = 0; + long ret; /* sanity */ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk)) @@ -1633,15 +1634,23 @@ static struct clk_core *clk_calc_new_rates(struct clk_core *clk, /* find the closest rate and parent clk/rate */ if (clk->ops->determine_rate) { parent_hw = parent ? parent->hw : NULL; - new_rate = clk->ops->determine_rate(clk->hw, rate, - min_rate, - max_rate, - &best_parent_rate, - &parent_hw); + ret = clk->ops->determine_rate(clk->hw, rate, + min_rate, + max_rate, + &best_parent_rate, + &parent_hw); + if (ret < 0) + return NULL; + + new_rate = ret; parent = parent_hw ? parent_hw->core : NULL; } else if (clk->ops->round_rate) { - new_rate = clk->ops->round_rate(clk->hw, rate, - &best_parent_rate); + ret = clk->ops->round_rate(clk->hw, rate, + &best_parent_rate); + if (ret < 0) + return NULL; + + new_rate = ret; if (new_rate < min_rate || new_rate > max_rate) return NULL; } else if (!parent || !(clk->flags & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT)) { -- 2.20.1