From 02b771b64b73226052d6e731a0987db3b47281e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lv Zheng Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 11:12:02 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / EC: Fix an issue caused by the serialized _Qxx evaluations It is proven that Windows evaluates _Qxx handlers in a parallel way. This patch follows this fact, splits _Qxx evaluations from the NOTIFY queue to form a separate queue, so that _Qxx evaluations can be queued up on different CPUs rather than being queued up on a CPU0 bound queue. Event handling related callbacks are also renamed and sorted in this patch. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94411 Reported-and-tested-by: Gabriele Mazzotta Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/ec.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c index 9d4761d2f6b7..3e57ee7c890f 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c @@ -165,8 +165,16 @@ struct transaction { u8 flags; }; +struct acpi_ec_query { + struct transaction transaction; + struct work_struct work; + struct acpi_ec_query_handler *handler; +}; + static int acpi_ec_query(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 *data); static void advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec); +static void acpi_ec_event_handler(struct work_struct *work); +static void acpi_ec_event_processor(struct work_struct *work); struct acpi_ec *boot_ec, *first_ec; EXPORT_SYMBOL(first_ec); @@ -978,60 +986,90 @@ void acpi_ec_remove_query_handler(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 query_bit) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_ec_remove_query_handler); -static void acpi_ec_run(void *cxt) +static struct acpi_ec_query *acpi_ec_create_query(u8 *pval) { - struct acpi_ec_query_handler *handler = cxt; + struct acpi_ec_query *q; + struct transaction *t; + + q = kzalloc(sizeof (struct acpi_ec_query), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!q) + return NULL; + INIT_WORK(&q->work, acpi_ec_event_processor); + t = &q->transaction; + t->command = ACPI_EC_COMMAND_QUERY; + t->rdata = pval; + t->rlen = 1; + return q; +} + +static void acpi_ec_delete_query(struct acpi_ec_query *q) +{ + if (q) { + if (q->handler) + acpi_ec_put_query_handler(q->handler); + kfree(q); + } +} + +static void acpi_ec_event_processor(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct acpi_ec_query *q = container_of(work, struct acpi_ec_query, work); + struct acpi_ec_query_handler *handler = q->handler; - if (!handler) - return; ec_dbg_evt("Query(0x%02x) started", handler->query_bit); if (handler->func) handler->func(handler->data); else if (handler->handle) acpi_evaluate_object(handler->handle, NULL, NULL, NULL); ec_dbg_evt("Query(0x%02x) stopped", handler->query_bit); - acpi_ec_put_query_handler(handler); + acpi_ec_delete_query(q); } static int acpi_ec_query(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 *data) { u8 value = 0; int result; - acpi_status status; struct acpi_ec_query_handler *handler; - struct transaction t = {.command = ACPI_EC_COMMAND_QUERY, - .wdata = NULL, .rdata = &value, - .wlen = 0, .rlen = 1}; + struct acpi_ec_query *q; + + q = acpi_ec_create_query(&value); + if (!q) + return -ENOMEM; /* * Query the EC to find out which _Qxx method we need to evaluate. * Note that successful completion of the query causes the ACPI_EC_SCI * bit to be cleared (and thus clearing the interrupt source). */ - result = acpi_ec_transaction(ec, &t); - if (result) - return result; - if (data) - *data = value; + result = acpi_ec_transaction(ec, &q->transaction); if (!value) - return -ENODATA; + result = -ENODATA; + if (result) + goto err_exit; mutex_lock(&ec->mutex); list_for_each_entry(handler, &ec->list, node) { if (value == handler->query_bit) { - /* have custom handler for this bit */ - handler = acpi_ec_get_query_handler(handler); + q->handler = acpi_ec_get_query_handler(handler); ec_dbg_evt("Query(0x%02x) scheduled", - handler->query_bit); - status = acpi_os_execute((handler->func) ? - OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER : OSL_GPE_HANDLER, - acpi_ec_run, handler); - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) + q->handler->query_bit); + /* + * It is reported that _Qxx are evaluated in a + * parallel way on Windows: + * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94411 + */ + if (!schedule_work(&q->work)) result = -EBUSY; break; } } mutex_unlock(&ec->mutex); + +err_exit: + if (result && q) + acpi_ec_delete_query(q); + if (data) + *data = value; return result; } -- 2.20.1