From 0073887ae5e23bfadb76fc5951b1fcd508a7a3bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:18:57 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] ibmvfc: prevent a potential deadlock

My static checker complains that we need to unlock on this path.  Seems
true.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
index fc523c3e5019..ab67ec4b6bd6 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
@@ -4722,6 +4722,8 @@ static void ibmvfc_rport_add_thread(struct work_struct *work)
 					tgt_dbg(tgt, "Setting rport roles\n");
 					fc_remote_port_rolechg(rport, tgt->ids.roles);
 					put_device(&rport->dev);
+				} else {
+					spin_unlock_irqrestore(vhost->host->host_lock, flags);
 				}
 
 				kref_put(&tgt->kref, ibmvfc_release_tgt);
-- 
2.20.1