GitHub/exynos8895/android_kernel_samsung_universal8895.git
10 years agobtrfs: Replace fs_info->rmw_workers workqueue with btrfs_workqueue.
Qu Wenruo [Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:46:11 +0000 (10:46 +0800)]
btrfs: Replace fs_info->rmw_workers workqueue with btrfs_workqueue.

Replace the fs_info->rmw_workers with the newly created
btrfs_workqueue.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Replace fs_info->endio_* workqueue with btrfs_workqueue.
Qu Wenruo [Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:46:10 +0000 (10:46 +0800)]
btrfs: Replace fs_info->endio_* workqueue with btrfs_workqueue.

Replace the fs_info->endio_* workqueues with the newly created
btrfs_workqueue.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Replace fs_info->flush_workers with btrfs_workqueue.
Qu Wenruo [Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:46:09 +0000 (10:46 +0800)]
btrfs: Replace fs_info->flush_workers with btrfs_workqueue.

Replace the fs_info->submit_workers with the newly created
btrfs_workqueue.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Replace fs_info->submit_workers with btrfs_workqueue.
Qu Wenruo [Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:46:08 +0000 (10:46 +0800)]
btrfs: Replace fs_info->submit_workers with btrfs_workqueue.

Much like the fs_info->workers, replace the fs_info->submit_workers
use the same btrfs_workqueue.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Replace fs_info->delalloc_workers with btrfs_workqueue
Qu Wenruo [Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:46:07 +0000 (10:46 +0800)]
btrfs: Replace fs_info->delalloc_workers with btrfs_workqueue

Much like the fs_info->workers, replace the fs_info->delalloc_workers
use the same btrfs_workqueue.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Replace fs_info->workers with btrfs_workqueue.
Qu Wenruo [Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:46:06 +0000 (10:46 +0800)]
btrfs: Replace fs_info->workers with btrfs_workqueue.

Use the newly created btrfs_workqueue_struct to replace the original
fs_info->workers

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Add threshold workqueue based on kernel workqueue
Qu Wenruo [Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:46:05 +0000 (10:46 +0800)]
btrfs: Add threshold workqueue based on kernel workqueue

The original btrfs_workers has thresholding functions to dynamically
create or destroy kthreads.

Though there is no such function in kernel workqueue because the worker
is not created manually, we can still use the workqueue_set_max_active
to simulated the behavior, mainly to achieve a better HDD performance by
setting a high threshold on submit_workers.
(Sadly, no resource can be saved)

So in this patch, extra workqueue pending counters are introduced to
dynamically change the max active of each btrfs_workqueue_struct, hoping
to restore the behavior of the original thresholding function.

Also, workqueue_set_max_active use a mutex to protect workqueue_struct,
which is not meant to be called too frequently, so a new interval
mechanism is applied, that will only call workqueue_set_max_active after
a count of work is queued. Hoping to balance both the random and
sequence performance on HDD.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Add high priority workqueue support for btrfs_workqueue_struct
Qu Wenruo [Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:46:04 +0000 (10:46 +0800)]
btrfs: Add high priority workqueue support for btrfs_workqueue_struct

Add high priority function to btrfs_workqueue.

This is implemented by embedding a btrfs_workqueue into a
btrfs_workqueue and use some helper functions to differ the normal
priority wq and high priority wq.
So the high priority wq is completely independent from the normal
workqueue.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Added btrfs_workqueue_struct implemented ordered execution based on kernel...
Qu Wenruo [Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:46:03 +0000 (10:46 +0800)]
btrfs: Added btrfs_workqueue_struct implemented ordered execution based on kernel workqueue

Use kernel workqueue to implement a new btrfs_workqueue_struct, which
has the ordering execution feature like the btrfs_worker.

The func is executed in a concurrency way, and the
ordred_func/ordered_free is executed in the sequence them are queued
after the corresponding func is done.

The new btrfs_workqueue works much like the original one, one workqueue
for normal work and a list for ordered work.
When a work is queued, ordered work will be added to the list and helper
function will be queued into the workqueue.
The helper function will execute a normal work and then check and execute as many
ordered work as possible in the sequence they were queued.

At this patch, high priority work queue or thresholding is not added yet.
The high priority feature and thresholding will be added in the following patches.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Cleanup the unused struct async_sched.
Qu Wenruo [Fri, 28 Feb 2014 02:46:02 +0000 (10:46 +0800)]
btrfs: Cleanup the unused struct async_sched.

The struct async_sched is not used by any codes and can be removed.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: skip search tree for REG files
Liu Bo [Thu, 27 Feb 2014 09:29:01 +0000 (17:29 +0800)]
Btrfs: skip search tree for REG files

It is really unnecessary to search tree again for @gen, @mode and @rdev
in the case of REG inodes' creation, as we've got btrfs_inode_item in sctx,
and @gen, @mode and @rdev can easily be fetched.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix preallocate vs double nocow write
Miao Xie [Thu, 27 Feb 2014 05:58:05 +0000 (13:58 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix preallocate vs double nocow write

We can not release the reserved metadata space for the first write if we
find the write position is pre-allocated. Because the kernel might write
the data on the disk before we do the second write but after the can-nocow
check, if we release the space for the first write, we might fail to update
the metadata because of no space.

Fix this problem by end nocow write if there is dirty data in the range whose
space is pre-allocated.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix wrong lock range and write size in check_can_nocow()
Miao Xie [Thu, 27 Feb 2014 05:58:04 +0000 (13:58 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix wrong lock range and write size in check_can_nocow()

The write range may not be sector-aligned, for example:

       |--------|--------| <- write range, sector-unaligned, size: 2blocks
  |--------|--------|--------|  <- correct lock range, size: 3blocks

But according to the old code, we used the size of write range to calculate
the lock range directly, not considered the offset, we would get a wrong lock
range:

       |--------|--------| <- write range, sector-unaligned, size: 2blocks
  |--------|--------| <- wrong lock range, size: 2blocks

And besides that, the old code also had the same problem when calculating
the real write size. Correct them.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: send: simplify allocation code in fs_path_ensure_buf
David Sterba [Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:33:08 +0000 (19:33 +0100)]
btrfs: send: simplify allocation code in fs_path_ensure_buf

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: send: fix old buffer length in fs_path_ensure_buf
David Sterba [Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:32:59 +0000 (19:32 +0100)]
btrfs: send: fix old buffer length in fs_path_ensure_buf

In "btrfs: send: lower memory requirements in common case" the code to
save the old_buf_len was incorrectly moved to a wrong place and broke
the original logic.

Reported-by: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: more efficient btrfs_drop_extent_cache
Filipe Manana [Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:15:13 +0000 (14:15 +0000)]
Btrfs: more efficient btrfs_drop_extent_cache

While droping extent map structures from the extent cache that cover our
target range, we would remove each extent map structure from the red black
tree and then add either 1 or 2 new extent map structures if the former
extent map covered sections outside our target range.

This change simply attempts to replace the existing extent map structure
with a new one that covers the subsection we're not interested in, instead
of doing a red black remove operation followed by an insertion operation.

The number of elements in an inode's extent map tree can get very high for large
files under random writes. For example, while running the following test:

    sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=1 --file-total-size=10G \
        --file-test-mode=rndrw --num-threads=32 --file-block-size=32768 \
        --max-requests=500000 --file-rw-ratio=2 [prepare|run]

I captured the following histogram capturing the number of extent_map items
in the red black tree while that test was running:

    Count: 122462
    Range:  1.000 - 172231.000; Mean: 96415.831; Median: 101855.000; Stddev: 49700.981
    Percentiles:  90th: 160120.000; 95th: 166335.000; 99th: 171070.000
       1.000 -    5.231:   452 |
       5.231 -  187.392:    87 |
     187.392 -  585.911:   206 |
     585.911 - 1827.438:   623 |
    1827.438 - 5695.245:  1962 #
    5695.245 - 17744.861:  6204 ####
   17744.861 - 55283.764: 21115 ############
   55283.764 - 172231.000: 91813 #####################################################

Benchmark:

    sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=1 --file-total-size=10G --file-test-mode=rndwr \
        --num-threads=64 --file-block-size=32768 --max-requests=0 --max-time=60 \
        --file-io-mode=sync --file-fsync-freq=0 [prepare|run]

Before this change: 122.1Mb/sec
After this change:  125.07Mb/sec
(averages of 5 test runs)

Test machine: quad core intel i5-3570K, 32Gb of ram, SSD

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: more efficient split extent state insertion
Filipe Manana [Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:05:53 +0000 (15:05 +0000)]
Btrfs: more efficient split extent state insertion

When we split an extent state there's no need to start the rbtree search
from the root node - we can start it from the original extent state node,
since we would end up in its subtree if we do the search starting at the
root node anyway.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: remove unneeded field / smaller extent_map structure
Filipe Manana [Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:15:12 +0000 (14:15 +0000)]
Btrfs: remove unneeded field / smaller extent_map structure

We don't need to have an unsigned int field in the extent_map struct
to tell us whether the extent map is in the inode's extent_map tree or
not. We can use the rb_node struct field and the RB_CLEAR_NODE and
RB_EMPTY_NODE macros to achieve the same task.

This reduces sizeof(struct extent_map) from 152 bytes to 144 bytes (on a
64 bits system).

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: skip locking when searching commit root
Wang Shilong [Thu, 13 Feb 2014 03:19:47 +0000 (11:19 +0800)]
Btrfs: skip locking when searching commit root

We won't change commit root, skip locking dance with commit root
when walking backrefs, this can speed up btrfs send operations.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: wake up @scrub_pause_wait as much as we can
Wang Shilong [Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:24:19 +0000 (19:24 +0800)]
Btrfs: wake up @scrub_pause_wait as much as we can

check if @scrubs_running=@scrubs_paused condition inside wait_event()
is not an atomic operation which means we may inc/dec @scrub_running/
paused at any time. Let's wake up @scrub_pause_wait as much as we can
to let commit transaction blocked less.

An example below:

Thread1 Thread2
|->scrub_blocked_if_needed() |->scrub_pending_trans_workers_inc
  |->increase @scrub_paused
                                       |->increase @scrub_running
  |->wake up scrub_pause_wait list
                                       |->scrub blocked
                                       |->increase @scrub_paused

Thread3 is commiting transaction which is blocked at btrfs_scrub_pause().
So after Thread2 increase @scrub_paused, we meet the condition
@scrub_paused=@scrub_running, but transaction will be still blocked until
another calling to wake up @scrub_pause_wait.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: cancel scrub on transaction abortion
Wang Shilong [Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:24:18 +0000 (19:24 +0800)]
Btrfs: cancel scrub on transaction abortion

If we fail to commit transaction, we'd better
cancel scrub operations.

Suggested-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: device_replace: fix deadlock for nocow case
Wang Shilong [Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:24:17 +0000 (19:24 +0800)]
Btrfs: device_replace: fix deadlock for nocow case

commit cb7ab02156e4 cause a following deadlock found by
xfstests,btrfs/011:

Thread1 is commiting transaction which is blocked at
btrfs_scrub_pause().

Thread2 is calling btrfs_file_aio_write() which has held
inode's @i_mutex and commit transaction(blocked because
Thread1 is committing transaction).

Thread3 is copy_nocow_page worker which will also try to
hold inode @i_mutex, so thread3 will wait Thread1 finished.

Thread4 is waiting pending workers finished which will wait
Thread3 finished. So the problem is like this:

Thread1--->Thread4--->Thread3--->Thread2---->Thread1

Deadlock happens! we fix it by letting Thread1 go firstly,
which means we won't block transaction commit while we are
waiting pending workers finished.

Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix a possible deadlock between scrub and transaction committing
Wang Shilong [Wed, 19 Feb 2014 11:24:16 +0000 (19:24 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix a possible deadlock between scrub and transaction committing

btrfs_scrub_continue() will be called when cleaning up transaction.However,
this can only be called if btrfs_scrub_pause() is called before.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO
Sachin Kamat [Mon, 17 Feb 2014 03:43:57 +0000 (09:13 +0530)]
btrfs: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO

PTR_RET is deprecated. Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO instead. While at it
also include missing err.h header.

Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix send issuing outdated paths for utimes, chown and chmod
Filipe Manana [Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:01:32 +0000 (00:01 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix send issuing outdated paths for utimes, chown and chmod

When doing an incremental send, if we had a directory pending a move/rename
operation and none of its parents, except for the immediate parent, were
pending a move/rename, after processing the directory's references, we would
be issuing utimes, chown and chmod intructions against am outdated path - a
path which matched the one in the parent root.

This change also simplifies a bit the code that deals with building a path
for a directory which has a move/rename operation delayed.

Steps to reproduce:

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
    $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
    $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e
    $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/f
    $ chmod 0777 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e
    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
    $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/f /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2/e2
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2
    $ chmod 0700 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2/e2
    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
    $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

    $ umount /mnt/btrfs
    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
    $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
    $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send
    $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send

The second btrfs receive command failed with:

    ERROR: chmod a/b/c/d/e failed. No such file or directory

A test case for xfstests follows.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: correctly determine if blocks are shared in btrfs_compare_trees
Filipe Manana [Thu, 20 Feb 2014 21:15:25 +0000 (21:15 +0000)]
Btrfs: correctly determine if blocks are shared in btrfs_compare_trees

Just comparing the pointers (logical disk addresses) of the btree nodes is
not completely bullet proof, we have to check if their generation numbers
match too.

It is guaranteed that a COW operation will result in a block with a different
logical disk address than the original block's address, but over time we can
reuse that former logical disk address.

For example, creating a 2Gb filesystem on a loop device, and having a script
running in a loop always updating the access timestamp of a file, resulted in
the same logical disk address being reused for the same fs btree block in about
only 4 minutes.

This could make us skip entire subtrees when doing an incremental send (which
is currently the only user of btrfs_compare_trees). However the odds of getting
2 blocks at the same tree level, with the same logical disk address, equal first
slot keys and different generations, should hopefully be very low.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories
Filipe Manana [Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:31:44 +0000 (14:31 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix send attempting to rmdir non-empty directories

The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue
a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently
processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced
the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such
inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation,
because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and
was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit
addressed:

    9f03740a956d7ac6a1b8f8c455da6fa5cae11c22
    (Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send)

This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the
target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail.
Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to
be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation.

Simple steps to reproduce this issue:

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
    $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
    $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x
    $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y
    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
    $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY
    $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
    $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

    $ umount /mnt/btrfs
    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
    $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
    $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send
    $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send

The second btrfs receive command failed with:

    ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty

A test case for xfstests follows.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: send, don't send rmdir for same target multiple times
Filipe Manana [Sun, 16 Feb 2014 21:01:39 +0000 (21:01 +0000)]
Btrfs: send, don't send rmdir for same target multiple times

When doing an incremental send, if we delete a directory that has N > 1
hardlinks for the same file and that file has the highest inode number
inside the directory contents, an incremental send would send N times an
rmdir operation against the directory. This made the btrfs receive command
fail on the second rmdir instruction, as the target directory didn't exist
anymore.

Steps to reproduce the issue:

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
    $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
    $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
    $ echo 'ola mundo' > /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/foo.txt
    $ ln /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/foo.txt /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/bar.txt
    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
    $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
    $ rm -f /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/foo.txt
    $ rm -f /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/bar.txt
    $ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
    $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

    $ umount /mnt/btrfs
    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
    $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
    $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send
    $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send

The second btrfs receive command failed with:

    ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. No such file or directory

A test case for xfstests follows.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path after dir rename
Filipe Manana [Sun, 16 Feb 2014 13:43:11 +0000 (13:43 +0000)]
Btrfs: incremental send, fix invalid path after dir rename

This fixes yet one more case not caught by the commit titled:

   Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send

In this case, even before the initial full send, we have a directory
which is a child of a directory with a higher inode number. Then we
perform the initial send, and after we rename both the child and the
parent, without moving them around. After doing these 2 renames, an
incremental send sent a rename instruction for the child directory
which contained an invalid "from" path (referenced the parent's old
name, not the new one), which made the btrfs receive command fail.

Steps to reproduce:

    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
    $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
    $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b
    $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/d
    $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
    $ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x
    $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/y
    $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
    $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send

    $ umout /mnt/btrfs
    $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
    $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
    $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send
    $ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send

The second btrfs receive command failed with:
  "ERROR: rename a/b/c/d -> a/b/x/y failed. No such file or directory"

A test case for xfstests follows.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: don't insert useless holes when punching beyond the inode's size
Filipe Manana [Sat, 15 Feb 2014 15:55:58 +0000 (15:55 +0000)]
Btrfs: don't insert useless holes when punching beyond the inode's size

If we punch beyond the size of an inode, we'll correctly remove any prealloc extents,
but we'll also insert file extent items representing holes (disk bytenr == 0) that start
with a key offset that lies beyond the inode's size and are not contiguous with the last
file extent item.

Example:

  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 118811" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fpunch 582007 864596" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0x0d -b 39987 92267 39987" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo

btrfs-debug-tree output:

  item 4 key (257 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 15885 itemsize 160
inode generation 6 transid 6 size 132254 block group 0 mode 100600 links 1
  item 5 key (257 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 15872 itemsize 13
inode ref index 2 namelen 3 name: foo
  item 6 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15819 itemsize 53
extent data disk byte 0 nr 0 gen 6
extent data offset 0 nr 90112 ram 122880
extent compression 0
  item 7 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 90112) itemoff 15766 itemsize 53
extent data disk byte 12845056 nr 4096 gen 6
extent data offset 0 nr 45056 ram 45056
extent compression 2
  item 8 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 585728) itemoff 15713 itemsize 53
extent data disk byte 0 nr 0 gen 6
extent data offset 0 nr 860160 ram 860160
extent compression 0

The last extent item, which represents a hole, is useless as it lies beyond the inode's
size.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: cleanup delayed-ref.c:find_ref_head()
Filipe Manana [Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:07:53 +0000 (15:07 +0000)]
Btrfs: cleanup delayed-ref.c:find_ref_head()

The argument last wasn't used, all callers supplied a NULL value
for it. Also removed unnecessary intermediate storage of the result
of key comparisons.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: remove unnecessary ref heads rb tree search
Filipe Manana [Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:07:52 +0000 (15:07 +0000)]
Btrfs: remove unnecessary ref heads rb tree search

When we didn't find the exact ref head we were looking for, if
return_bigger != 0 we set a new search key to match either the
next node after the last one we found or the first one in the
ref heads rb tree, and then did another full tree search. For both
cases this ended up being pointless as we would end up returning
an entry we already had before repeating the search.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: wake up transaction thread upon remount
Justin Maggard [Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:48:07 +0000 (08:48 -0800)]
btrfs: wake up transaction thread upon remount

Now that we can adjust the commit interval with a remount, we need
to wake up the transaction thread or else he will continue to sleep
until the previous transaction interval has elapsed before waking
up.  So, if we go from a large commit interval to something smaller,
the transaction thread will not wake up until the large interval has
expired.  This also causes the cleaner thread to stay sleeping, since
it gets woken up by the transaction thread.

Fix it by simply waking up the transaction thread during a remount.

Signed-off-by: Justin Maggard <jmaggard10@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: stop joining the log transaction if sync log fails
Miao Xie [Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:08:57 +0000 (18:08 +0800)]
Btrfs: stop joining the log transaction if sync log fails

If the log sync fails, there is something wrong in the log tree, we
should not continue to join the log transaction and log the metadata.
What we should do is to do a full commit.

This patch fixes this problem by setting ->last_trans_log_full_commit
to the current transaction id, it will tell the tasks not to join
the log transaction, and do a full commit.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: just wait or commit our own log sub-transaction
Miao Xie [Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:08:59 +0000 (18:08 +0800)]
Btrfs: just wait or commit our own log sub-transaction

We might commit the log sub-transaction which didn't contain the metadata we
logged. It was because we didn't record the log transid and just select
the current log sub-transaction to commit, but the right one might be
committed by the other task already. Actually, we needn't do anything
and it is safe that we go back directly in this case.

This patch improves the log sync by the above idea. We record the transid
of the log sub-transaction in which we log the metadata, and the transid
of the log sub-transaction we have committed. If the committed transid
is >= the transid we record when logging the metadata, we just go back.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix skipped error handle when log sync failed
Miao Xie [Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:08:58 +0000 (18:08 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix skipped error handle when log sync failed

It is possible that many tasks sync the log tree at the same time, but
only one task can do the sync work, the others will wait for it. But those
wait tasks didn't get the result of the log sync, and returned 0 when they
ended the wait. It caused those tasks skipped the error handle, and the
serious problem was they told the users the file sync succeeded but in
fact they failed.

This patch fixes this problem by introducing a log context structure,
we insert it into the a global list. When the sync fails, we will set
the error number of every log context in the list, then the waiting tasks
get the error number of the log context and handle the error if need.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: use signed integer instead of unsigned long integer for log transid
Miao Xie [Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:08:56 +0000 (18:08 +0800)]
Btrfs: use signed integer instead of unsigned long integer for log transid

The log trans id is initialized to be 0 every time we create a log tree,
and the log tree need be re-created after a new transaction is started,
it means the log trans id is unlikely to be a huge number, so we can use
signed integer instead of unsigned long integer to save a bit space.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: remove unnecessary memory barrier in btrfs_sync_log()
Miao Xie [Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:08:55 +0000 (18:08 +0800)]
Btrfs: remove unnecessary memory barrier in btrfs_sync_log()

Mutex unlock implies certain memory barriers to make sure all the memory
operation completes before the unlock, and the next mutex lock implies memory
barriers to make sure the all the memory happens after the lock. So it is
a full memory barrier(smp_mb), we needn't add memory barriers. Remove them.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: don't start the log transaction if the log tree init fails
Miao Xie [Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:08:53 +0000 (18:08 +0800)]
Btrfs: don't start the log transaction if the log tree init fails

The old code would start the log transaction even the log tree init
failed, it was unnecessary. Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix the skipped transaction commit during the file sync
Miao Xie [Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:08:52 +0000 (18:08 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix the skipped transaction commit during the file sync

We may abort the wait earlier if ->last_trans_log_full_commit was set to
the current transaction id, at this case, we need commit the current
transaction instead of the log sub-transaction. But the current code
didn't tell the caller to do it (return 0, not -EAGAIN). Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: use ACCESS_ONCE to prevent the optimize accesses to ->last_trans_log_full_commit
Miao Xie [Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:08:51 +0000 (18:08 +0800)]
Btrfs: use ACCESS_ONCE to prevent the optimize accesses to ->last_trans_log_full_commit

->last_trans_log_full_commit may be changed by the other tasks without lock,
so we need prevent the compiler from the optimize access just like
tmp = fs_info->last_trans_log_full_commit
if (tmp == ...)
...

<do something>

if (tmp == ...)
...

In fact, we need get the new value of ->last_trans_log_full_commit during
the second access. Fix it by ACCESS_ONCE().

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: avoid warning bomb of btrfs_invalidate_inodes
Liu Bo [Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:37:25 +0000 (17:37 +0800)]
Btrfs: avoid warning bomb of btrfs_invalidate_inodes

So after transaction is aborted, we need to cleanup inode resources by
calling btrfs_invalidate_inodes(), and btrfs_invalidate_inodes() hopes
roots' refs to be zero in old times and sets a WARN_ON(), however, this
is not always true within cleaning up transaction, so we get to detect
transaction abortion and not warn at all.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix possible deadlock in btrfs_cleanup_transaction
Liu Bo [Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:07:16 +0000 (17:07 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix possible deadlock in btrfs_cleanup_transaction

[13654.480669] ======================================================
[13654.480905] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[13654.481003] 3.12.0+ #4 Tainted: G        W  O
[13654.481060] -------------------------------------------------------
[13654.481060] btrfs-transacti/9347 is trying to acquire lock:
[13654.481060]  (&(&root->ordered_extent_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa02d30a1>] btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x271/0x570 [btrfs]
[13654.481060] but task is already holding lock:
[13654.481060]  (&(&fs_info->ordered_root_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa02d3015>] btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x1e5/0x570 [btrfs]
[13654.481060] which lock already depends on the new lock.

[13654.481060] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[13654.481060] -> #1 (&(&fs_info->ordered_root_lock)->rlock){+.+...}:
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffff810c4103>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x130
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffff81689991>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x50
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa02f011b>] __btrfs_add_ordered_extent+0x39b/0x450 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa02f0202>] btrfs_add_ordered_extent+0x32/0x40 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa02df6aa>] run_delalloc_nocow+0x78a/0x9d0 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa02dfc0d>] run_delalloc_range+0x31d/0x390 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa02f7c00>] __extent_writepage+0x310/0x780 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa02f830a>] extent_write_cache_pages.isra.29.constprop.48+0x29a/0x410 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa02f879d>] extent_writepages+0x4d/0x70 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa02d9f68>] btrfs_writepages+0x28/0x30 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffff8114be91>] do_writepages+0x21/0x50
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffff81140d49>] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x59/0x60
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffff81140e13>] filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x13/0x20
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa02f1db9>] btrfs_wait_ordered_range+0x49/0x140 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa0318fe2>] __btrfs_write_out_cache+0x682/0x8b0 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa031952d>] btrfs_write_out_cache+0x8d/0xe0 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa02c7083>] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x593/0x680 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa0345307>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x14b/0x20d [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa02d7c1a>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x43a/0x9d0 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa030061a>] btrfs_create_uuid_tree+0x5a/0x100 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa02d5a8a>] open_ctree+0x21da/0x2210 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa02ab6fe>] btrfs_mount+0x68e/0x870 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffff811b2409>] mount_fs+0x39/0x1b0
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffff811cd653>] vfs_kern_mount+0x63/0xf0
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffff811cfcce>] do_mount+0x23e/0xa90
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffff811d05a3>] SyS_mount+0x83/0xc0
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffff81692b52>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[13654.481060] -> #0 (&(&root->ordered_extent_lock)->rlock){+.+...}:
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffff810c340a>] __lock_acquire+0x150a/0x1a70
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffff810c4103>] lock_acquire+0x93/0x130
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffff81689991>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x50
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa02d30a1>] btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x271/0x570 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffffa02d35ce>] transaction_kthread+0x22e/0x270 [btrfs]
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffff81079efa>] kthread+0xea/0xf0
[13654.481060]        [<ffffffff81692aac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[13654.481060] other info that might help us debug this:

[13654.481060]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[13654.481060]        CPU0                    CPU1
[13654.481060]        ----                    ----
[13654.481060]   lock(&(&fs_info->ordered_root_lock)->rlock);
[13654.481060]  lock(&(&root->ordered_extent_lock)->rlock);
[13654.481060]  lock(&(&fs_info->ordered_root_lock)->rlock);
[13654.481060]   lock(&(&root->ordered_extent_lock)->rlock);
[13654.481060]
 *** DEADLOCK ***
[...]

======================================================

btrfs_destroy_all_ordered_extents()
gets &fs_info->ordered_root_lock __BEFORE__ acquiring &root->ordered_extent_lock,
while btrfs_[add,remove]_ordered_extent()
acquires &fs_info->ordered_root_lock __AFTER__ getting &root->ordered_extent_lock.

This patch fixes the above problem.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: faster/more efficient insertion of file extent items
Filipe David Borba Manana [Sun, 9 Feb 2014 23:45:12 +0000 (23:45 +0000)]
Btrfs: faster/more efficient insertion of file extent items

This is an extension to my previous commit titled:

  "Btrfs: faster file extent item replace operations"
  (hash 1acae57b161ef1282f565ef907f72aeed0eb71d9)

Instead of inserting the new file extent item if we deleted existing
file extent items covering our target file range, also allow to insert
the new file extent item if we didn't find any existing items to delete
and replace_extent != 0, since in this case our caller would do another
tree search to insert the new file extent item anyway, therefore just
combine the two tree searches into a single one, saving cpu time, reducing
lock contention and reducing btree node/leaf COW operations.

This covers the case where applications keep doing tail append writes to
files, which for example is the case of Apache CouchDB (its database and
view index files are always open with O_APPEND).

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: always choose work from prio_head first
Stanislaw Gruszka [Sat, 8 Feb 2014 22:18:43 +0000 (23:18 +0100)]
btrfs: always choose work from prio_head first

In case we do not refill, we can overwrite cur pointer from prio_head
by one from not prioritized head, what looks as something that was
not intended.

This change make we always take works from prio_head first until it's
not empty.

Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoRevert "Btrfs: remove transaction from btrfs send"
Wang Shilong [Sat, 8 Feb 2014 15:46:36 +0000 (23:46 +0800)]
Revert "Btrfs: remove transaction from btrfs send"

This reverts commit 41ce9970a8a6a362ae8df145f7a03d789e9ef9d2.
Previously i was thinking we can use readonly root's commit root
safely while it is not true, readonly root may be cowed with the
following cases.

1.snapshot send root will cow source root.
2.balance,device operations will also cow readonly send root
to relocate.

So i have two ideas to make us safe to use commit root.

-->approach 1:
make it protected by transaction and end transaction properly and we research
next item from root node(see btrfs_search_slot_for_read()).

-->approach 2:
add another counter to local root structure to sync snapshot with send.
and add a global counter to sync send with exclusive device operations.

So with approach 2, send can use commit root safely, because we make sure
send root can not be cowed during send. Unfortunately, it make codes *ugly*
and more complex to maintain.

To make snapshot and send exclusively, device operations and send operation
exclusively with each other is a little confusing for common users.

So why not drop into previous way.

Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: skip readonly root for snapshot-aware defragment
Wang Shilong [Sat, 8 Feb 2014 15:46:35 +0000 (23:46 +0800)]
Btrfs: skip readonly root for snapshot-aware defragment

Btrfs send is assuming readonly root won't change, let's skip readonly root.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: switch to btrfs_previous_extent_item()
Wang Shilong [Thu, 6 Feb 2014 12:02:29 +0000 (20:02 +0800)]
Btrfs: switch to btrfs_previous_extent_item()

Since we have introduced btrfs_previous_extent_item() to search previous
extent item, just switch into it.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: skip submitting barrier for missing device
Hidetoshi Seto [Wed, 5 Feb 2014 07:34:38 +0000 (16:34 +0900)]
Btrfs: skip submitting barrier for missing device

I got an error on v3.13:
 BTRFS error (device sdf1) in write_all_supers:3378: errno=-5 IO failure (errors while submitting device barriers.)

how to reproduce:
  > mkfs.btrfs -f -d raid1 /dev/sdf1 /dev/sdf2
  > wipefs -a /dev/sdf2
  > mount -o degraded /dev/sdf1 /mnt
  > btrfs balance start -f -sconvert=single -mconvert=single -dconvert=single /mnt

The reason of the error is that barrier_all_devices() failed to submit
barrier to the missing device.  However it is clear that we cannot do
anything on missing device, and also it is not necessary to care chunks
on the missing device.

This patch stops sending/waiting barrier if device is missing.

Signed-off-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: unlock extent and pages on error in cow_file_range
Josef Bacik [Fri, 7 Feb 2014 17:21:23 +0000 (12:21 -0500)]
Btrfs: unlock extent and pages on error in cow_file_range

When I converted the BUG_ON() for the free_space_cache_inode in cow_file_range I
made it so we just return an error instead of unlocking all of our various
stuff.  This is a mistake and causes us to hang when we run into this.  This
patch fixes this problem.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: balance delayed inode updates
Josef Bacik [Thu, 6 Feb 2014 21:06:06 +0000 (16:06 -0500)]
Btrfs: balance delayed inode updates

While trying to reproduce a delayed ref problem I noticed the box kept falling
over using all 80gb of my ram with btrfs_inode's and btrfs_delayed_node's.
Turns out this is because we only throttle delayed inode updates in
btrfs_dirty_inode, which doesn't actually get called that often, especially when
all you are doing is creating a bunch of files.  So balance delayed inode
updates everytime we create a new inode.  With this patch we no longer use up
all of our ram with delayed inode updates.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: add simple debugfs interface
David Sterba [Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:36:18 +0000 (15:36 +0100)]
btrfs: add simple debugfs interface

Help during debugging to export various interesting infromation and
tunables without the need of extra mount options or ioctls.

Usage:
* declare your variable in sysfs.h, and include where you need it
* define the variable in sysfs.c and make it visible via
  debugfs_create_TYPE

Depends on CONFIG_DEBUG_FS.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: send: lower memory requirements in common case
David Sterba [Wed, 5 Feb 2014 15:17:34 +0000 (16:17 +0100)]
btrfs: send: lower memory requirements in common case

The fs_path structure uses an inline buffer and falls back to a chain of
allocations, but vmalloc is not necessary because PATH_MAX fits into
PAGE_SIZE.

The size of fs_path has been reduced to 256 bytes from PAGE_SIZE,
usually 4k. Experimental measurements show that most paths on a single
filesystem do not exceed 200 bytes, and these get stored into the inline
buffer directly, which is now 230 bytes. Longer paths are kmalloced when
needed.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: make some tree searches in send.c more efficient
Filipe David Borba Manana [Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:48:56 +0000 (16:48 +0000)]
Btrfs: make some tree searches in send.c more efficient

We have this pattern where we do search for a contiguous group of
items in a tree and everytime we find an item, we process it, then
we release our path, increment the offset of the search key, do
another full tree search and repeat these steps until a tree search
can't find more items we're interested in.

Instead of doing these full tree searches after processing each item,
just process the next item/slot in our leaf and don't release the path.
Since all these trees are read only and we always use the commit root
for a search and skip node/leaf locks, we're not affecting concurrency
on the trees.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: use right extent item position in send when finding extent clones
Filipe David Borba Manana [Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:48:55 +0000 (16:48 +0000)]
Btrfs: use right extent item position in send when finding extent clones

This was a leftover from the commit:

   74dd17fbe3d65829e75d84f00a9525b2ace93998
   (Btrfs: fix btrfs send for inline items and compression)

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: send: remove BUG_ON from name_cache_delete
David Sterba [Mon, 3 Feb 2014 18:24:40 +0000 (19:24 +0100)]
btrfs: send: remove BUG_ON from name_cache_delete

If cleaning the name cache fails, we could try to proceed at the cost of
some memory leak. This is not expected to happen often.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: send: remove BUG from process_all_refs
David Sterba [Mon, 3 Feb 2014 18:24:19 +0000 (19:24 +0100)]
btrfs: send: remove BUG from process_all_refs

There are only 2 static callers, the BUG would normally be never
reached, but let's be nice.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: send: squeeze bitfilelds in fs_path
David Sterba [Mon, 3 Feb 2014 18:23:47 +0000 (19:23 +0100)]
btrfs: send: squeeze bitfilelds in fs_path

We know that buf_len is at most PATH_MAX, 4k, and can merge it with the
reversed member. This saves 3 bytes in favor of inline_buf.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: send: remove virtual_mem member from fs_path
David Sterba [Mon, 3 Feb 2014 18:23:33 +0000 (19:23 +0100)]
btrfs: send: remove virtual_mem member from fs_path

We don't need to keep track of that, it's available via is_vmalloc_addr.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: send: remove prepared member from fs_path
David Sterba [Mon, 3 Feb 2014 18:23:19 +0000 (19:23 +0100)]
btrfs: send: remove prepared member from fs_path

The member is used only to return value back from
fs_path_prepare_for_add, we can do it locally and save 8 bytes for the
inline_buf path.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: send: replace check with an assert in gen_unique_name
David Sterba [Mon, 3 Feb 2014 17:24:09 +0000 (18:24 +0100)]
btrfs: send: replace check with an assert in gen_unique_name

The buffer passed to snprintf can hold the fully expanded format string,
64 = 3x largest ULL + 3x char + trailing null.  I don't think that removing the
check entirely is a good idea, hence the ASSERT.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: more send support for parent/child dir relationship inversion
Filipe David Borba Manana [Sat, 1 Feb 2014 02:02:16 +0000 (02:02 +0000)]
Btrfs: more send support for parent/child dir relationship inversion

The commit titled "Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send"
didn't cover a particular case where the parent-child relationship inversion
of directories doesn't imply a rename of the new parent directory. This was
due to a simple logic mistake, a logical and instead of a logical or.

Steps to reproduce:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
  $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
  $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2/bar3/bar4
  $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2/bar3/bar4 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2/bar3 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44/bar3
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44/bar3/bar2/k11
  $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
  $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send

A patch to update the test btrfs/030 from xfstests, so that it covers
this case, will be submitted soon.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix send dealing with file renames and directory moves
Filipe David Borba Manana [Sat, 1 Feb 2014 02:00:15 +0000 (02:00 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix send dealing with file renames and directory moves

This fixes a case that the commit titled:

   Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send

didn't cover. If the parent-child relationship between 2 directories
is inverted, both get renamed, and the former parent has a file that
got renamed too (but remains a child of that directory), the incremental
send operation would use the file's old path after sending an unlink
operation for that old path, causing receive to fail on future operations
like changing owner, permissions or utimes of the corresponding inode.

This is not a regression from the commit mentioned before, as without
that commit we would fall into the issues that commit fixed, so it's
just one case that wasn't covered before.

Simple steps to reproduce this issue are:

      $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
      $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
      $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d
      $ touch /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/file
      $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x
      $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
      $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2
      $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2/d2
      $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2/d2/file /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2/d2/file2
      $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
      $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send

A patch to update the test btrfs/030 from xfstests, so that it covers
this case, will be submitted soon.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: only add roots if necessary in find_parent_nodes()
Wang Shilong [Fri, 31 Jan 2014 16:42:05 +0000 (00:42 +0800)]
Btrfs: only add roots if necessary in find_parent_nodes()

find_all_leafs() dosen't need add all roots actually, add roots only
if we need, this can avoid unnecessary ulist dance.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Fix 32/64-bit problem with BTRFS_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL ioctl
Hugo Mills [Thu, 30 Jan 2014 20:17:00 +0000 (20:17 +0000)]
btrfs: Fix 32/64-bit problem with BTRFS_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL ioctl

The structure for BTRFS_SET_RECEIVED_IOCTL packs differently on 32-bit
and 64-bit systems. This means that it is impossible to use btrfs
receive on a system with a 64-bit kernel and 32-bit userspace, because
the structure size (and hence the ioctl number) is different.

This patch adds a compatibility structure and ioctl to deal with the
above case.

Signed-off-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: add missing error check in incremental send
Filipe David Borba Manana [Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:27:12 +0000 (13:27 +0000)]
Btrfs: add missing error check in incremental send

Function wait_for_parent_move() returns negative value if an error
happened, 0 if we don't need to wait for the parent's move, and
1 if the wait is needed.
Before this change an error return value was being treated like the
return value 1, which was not correct.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix use-after-free in the finishing procedure of the device replace
Miao Xie [Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:46:55 +0000 (16:46 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix use-after-free in the finishing procedure of the device replace

During device replace test, we hit a null pointer deference (It was very easy
to reproduce it by running xfstests' btrfs/011 on the devices with the virtio
scsi driver). There were two bugs that caused this problem:
- We might allocate new chunks on the replaced device after we updated
  the mapping tree. And we forgot to replace the source device in those
  mapping of the new chunks.
- We might get the mapping information which including the source device
  before the mapping information update. And then submit the bio which was
  based on that mapping information after we freed the source device.

For the first bug, we can fix it by doing mapping tree update and source
device remove in the same context of the chunk mutex. The chunk mutex is
used to protect the allocable device list, the above method can avoid
the new chunk allocation, and after we remove the source device, all
the new chunks will be allocated on the new device. So it can fix
the first bug.

For the second bug, we need make sure all flighting bios are finished and
no new bios are produced during we are removing the source device. To fix
this problem, we introduced a global @bio_counter, we not only inc/dec
@bio_counter outsize of map_blocks, but also inc it before submitting bio
and dec @bio_counter when ending bios.

Since Raid56 is a little different and device replace dosen't support raid56
yet, it is not addressed in the patch and I add comments to make sure we will
fix it in the future.

Reported-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix unprotected alloc list insertion during the finishing procedure of replace
Miao Xie [Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:46:54 +0000 (16:46 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix unprotected alloc list insertion during the finishing procedure of replace

the alloc list of the filesystem is protected by ->chunk_mutex, we need
get that mutex when we insert the new device into the list.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: Return EXDEV for cross file system snapshot
Kusanagi Kouichi [Thu, 30 Jan 2014 07:32:02 +0000 (16:32 +0900)]
btrfs: Return EXDEV for cross file system snapshot

EXDEV seems an appropriate error if an operation fails bacause it
crosses file system boundaries.

Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Kusanagi Kouichi <slash@ac.auone-net.jp>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: don't mix the ordered extents of all files together during logging the inodes
Miao Xie [Tue, 14 Jan 2014 12:31:51 +0000 (20:31 +0800)]
Btrfs: don't mix the ordered extents of all files together during logging the inodes

There was a problem in the old code:
If we failed to log the csum, we would free all the ordered extents in the log list
including those ordered extents that were logged successfully, it would make the
log committer not to wait for the completion of the ordered extents.

This patch doesn't insert the ordered extents that is about to be logged into
a global list, instead, we insert them into a local list. If we log the ordered
extents successfully, we splice them with the global list, or we will throw them
away, then do full sync. It can also reduce the lock contention and the traverse
time of list.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: use right clone root offset for compressed extents
Filipe David Borba Manana [Sat, 15 Feb 2014 15:53:16 +0000 (15:53 +0000)]
Btrfs: use right clone root offset for compressed extents

For non compressed extents, iterate_extent_inodes() gives us offsets
that take into account the data offset from the file extent items, while
for compressed extents it doesn't. Therefore we have to adjust them before
placing them in a send clone instruction. Not doing this adjustment leads to
the receiving end requesting for a wrong a file range to the clone ioctl,
which results in different file content from the one in the original send
root.

Issue reproducible with the following excerpt from the test I made for
xfstests:

  _scratch_mkfs
  _scratch_mount "-o compress-force=lzo"

  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 118811" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0x0d -b 39987 92267 39987" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1

  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0x3e -b 80000 200000 80000" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xdc -b 10000 250000 10000" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xff -b 10000 300000 10000" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo

  # will be used for incremental send to be able to issue clone operations
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2

  $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $tmp/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1
  $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $tmp/2.fssum -x $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/mysnap1 \
      -x $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/clones_snap $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2
  $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $tmp/clones.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap \
      -x $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap/mysnap1 -x $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap/mysnap2

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $tmp/1.snap
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap -f $tmp/clones.snap
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 \
      -c $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 -f $tmp/2.snap

  _scratch_unmount
  _scratch_mkfs
  _scratch_mount

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/1.snap
  $FSSUM_PROG -r $tmp/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 2>> $seqres.full

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/clones.snap
  $FSSUM_PROG -r $tmp/clones.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap 2>> $seqres.full

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/2.snap
  $FSSUM_PROG -r $tmp/2.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 2>> $seqres.full

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: fix null pointer deference at btrfs_sysfs_add_one+0x105
Anand Jain [Wed, 15 Jan 2014 09:22:28 +0000 (17:22 +0800)]
btrfs: fix null pointer deference at btrfs_sysfs_add_one+0x105

bdev is null when disk has disappeared and mounted with
the degrade option

stack trace
---------
btrfs_sysfs_add_one+0x105/0x1c0 [btrfs]
open_ctree+0x15f3/0x1fe0 [btrfs]
btrfs_mount+0x5db/0x790 [btrfs]
? alloc_pages_current+0xa4/0x160
mount_fs+0x34/0x1b0
vfs_kern_mount+0x62/0xf0
do_mount+0x22e/0xa80
? __get_free_pages+0x9/0x40
? copy_mount_options+0x31/0x170
SyS_mount+0x7e/0xc0
system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
---------

reproducer:
-------
mkfs.btrfs -draid1 -mraid1 /dev/sdc /dev/sdd
(detach a disk)
devmgt detach /dev/sdc [1]
mount -o degrade /dev/sdd /btrfs
-------

[1] github.com/anajain/devmgt.git

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
Tested-by: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: unset DCACHE_DISCONNECTED when mounting default subvol
Josef Bacik [Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:43:48 +0000 (13:43 -0500)]
Btrfs: unset DCACHE_DISCONNECTED when mounting default subvol

A user was running into errors from an NFS export of a subvolume that had a
default subvol set.  When we mount a default subvol we will use d_obtain_alias()
to find an existing dentry for the subvolume in the case that the root subvol
has already been mounted, or a dummy one is allocated in the case that the root
subvol has not already been mounted.  This allows us to connect the dentry later
on if we wander into the path.  However if we don't ever wander into the path we
will keep DCACHE_DISCONNECTED set for a long time, which angers NFS.  It doesn't
appear to cause any problems but it is annoying nonetheless, so simply unset
DCACHE_DISCONNECTED in the get_default_root case and switch btrfs_lookup() to
use d_materialise_unique() instead which will make everything play nicely
together and reconnect stuff if we wander into the defaul subvol path from a
different way.  With this patch I'm no longer getting the NFS errors when
exporting a volume that has been mounted with a default subvol set.  Thanks,

cc: bfields@fieldses.org
cc: ebiederm@xmission.com
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix max_inline mount option
Mitch Harder [Thu, 13 Feb 2014 15:13:16 +0000 (09:13 -0600)]
Btrfs: fix max_inline mount option

Currently, the only mount option for max_inline that has any effect is
max_inline=0.  Any other value that is supplied to max_inline will be
adjusted to a minimum of 4k.  Since max_inline has an effective maximum
of ~3900 bytes due to page size limitations, the current behaviour
only has meaning for max_inline=0.

This patch will allow the the max_inline mount option to accept non-zero
values as indicated in the documentation.

Signed-off-by: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix a lockdep warning when cleaning up aborted transaction
Liu Bo [Sat, 8 Feb 2014 07:33:08 +0000 (15:33 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix a lockdep warning when cleaning up aborted transaction

Given now we have 2 spinlock for management of delayed refs,
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y helped me find this,

[ 4723.413809] BUG: spinlock wrong CPU on CPU#1, btrfs-transacti/2258
[ 4723.414882]  lock: 0xffff880048377670, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: btrfs-transacti/2258, .owner_cpu: 2
[ 4723.417146] CPU: 1 PID: 2258 Comm: btrfs-transacti Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0+ #4
[ 4723.421321] Call Trace:
[ 4723.421872]  [<ffffffff81680fe7>] dump_stack+0x54/0x74
[ 4723.422753]  [<ffffffff81681093>] spin_dump+0x8c/0x91
[ 4723.424979]  [<ffffffff816810b9>] spin_bug+0x21/0x26
[ 4723.425846]  [<ffffffff81323956>] do_raw_spin_unlock+0x66/0x90
[ 4723.434424]  [<ffffffff81689bf7>] _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x40
[ 4723.438747]  [<ffffffffa015da9e>] btrfs_cleanup_one_transaction+0x35e/0x710 [btrfs]
[ 4723.443321]  [<ffffffffa015df54>] btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x104/0x570 [btrfs]
[ 4723.444692]  [<ffffffff810c1b5d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xfd/0x1c0
[ 4723.450336]  [<ffffffff810c1c2d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[ 4723.451332]  [<ffffffffa015e5ee>] transaction_kthread+0x22e/0x270 [btrfs]
[ 4723.452543]  [<ffffffffa015e3c0>] ? btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0x570/0x570 [btrfs]
[ 4723.457833]  [<ffffffff81079efa>] kthread+0xea/0xf0
[ 4723.458990]  [<ffffffff81079e10>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140
[ 4723.460133]  [<ffffffff81692aac>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[ 4723.460865]  [<ffffffff81079e10>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x140/0x140
[ 4723.496521] ------------[ cut here ]------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------

The reason is that we get to call cond_resched_lock(&head_ref->lock) while
still holding @delayed_refs->lock.

So it's different with __btrfs_run_delayed_refs(), where we do drop-acquire
dance before and after actually processing delayed refs.

Here we don't drop the lock, others are not able to add new delayed refs to
head_ref, so cond_resched_lock(&head_ref->lock) is not necessary here.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoRevert "btrfs: add ioctl to export size of global metadata reservation"
Chris Mason [Fri, 14 Feb 2014 21:42:13 +0000 (13:42 -0800)]
Revert "btrfs: add ioctl to export size of global metadata reservation"

This reverts commit 01e219e8069516cdb98594d417b8bb8d906ed30d.

David Sterba found a different way to provide these features without adding a new
ioctl.  We haven't released any progs with this ioctl yet, so I'm taking this out
for now until we finalize things.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
CC: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix data corruption when reading/updating compressed extents
Filipe David Borba Manana [Sat, 8 Feb 2014 15:47:46 +0000 (15:47 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix data corruption when reading/updating compressed extents

When using a mix of compressed file extents and prealloc extents, it
is possible to fill a page of a file with random, garbage data from
some unrelated previous use of the page, instead of a sequence of zeroes.

A simple sequence of steps to get into such case, taken from the test
case I made for xfstests, is:

   _scratch_mkfs
   _scratch_mount "-o compress-force=lzo"
   $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0x06 -b 18670 266978 18670" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar
   $XFS_IO_PROG -c "falloc 26450 665194" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar
   $XFS_IO_PROG -c "truncate 542872" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar
   $XFS_IO_PROG -c "fsync" $SCRATCH_MNT/foobar

This results in the following file items in the fs tree:

   item 4 key (257 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 15879 itemsize 160
       inode generation 6 transid 6 size 542872 block group 0 mode 100600
   item 5 key (257 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 15863 itemsize 16
       inode ref index 2 namelen 6 name: foobar
   item 6 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15810 itemsize 53
       extent data disk byte 0 nr 0 gen 6
       extent data offset 0 nr 24576 ram 266240
       extent compression 0
   item 7 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 24576) itemoff 15757 itemsize 53
       prealloc data disk byte 12849152 nr 241664 gen 6
       prealloc data offset 0 nr 241664
   item 8 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 266240) itemoff 15704 itemsize 53
       extent data disk byte 12845056 nr 4096 gen 6
       extent data offset 0 nr 20480 ram 20480
       extent compression 2
   item 9 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 286720) itemoff 15651 itemsize 53
       prealloc data disk byte 13090816 nr 405504 gen 6
       prealloc data offset 0 nr 258048

The on disk extent at offset 266240 (which corresponds to 1 single disk block),
contains 5 compressed chunks of file data. Each of the first 4 compress 4096
bytes of file data, while the last one only compresses 3024 bytes of file data.
Therefore a read into the file region [285648 ; 286720[ (length = 4096 - 3024 =
1072 bytes) should always return zeroes (our next extent is a prealloc one).

The solution here is the compression code path to zero the remaining (untouched)
bytes of the last page it uncompressed data into, as the information about how
much space the file data consumes in the last page is not known in the upper layer
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:__do_readpage(). In __do_readpage we were correctly zeroing
the remainder of the page but only if it corresponds to the last page of the inode
and if the inode's size is not a multiple of the page size.

This would cause not only returning random data on reads, but also permanently
storing random data when updating parts of the region that should be zeroed.
For the example above, it means updating a single byte in the region [285648 ; 286720[
would store that byte correctly but also store random data on disk.

A test case for xfstests follows soon.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: don't loop forever if we can't run because of the tree mod log
Josef Bacik [Fri, 7 Feb 2014 18:57:59 +0000 (13:57 -0500)]
Btrfs: don't loop forever if we can't run because of the tree mod log

A user reported a 100% cpu hang with my new delayed ref code.  Turns out I
forgot to increase the count check when we can't run a delayed ref because of
the tree mod log.  If we can't run any delayed refs during this there is no
point in continuing to look, and we need to break out.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: reserve no transaction units in btrfs_ioctl_set_features
David Sterba [Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:34:04 +0000 (14:34 +0100)]
btrfs: reserve no transaction units in btrfs_ioctl_set_features

Added in patch "btrfs: add ioctls to query/change feature bits online"
modifications to superblock don't need to reserve metadata blocks when
starting a transaction.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: commit transaction after setting label and features
Jeff Mahoney [Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:33:57 +0000 (14:33 +0100)]
btrfs: commit transaction after setting label and features

The set_fslabel ioctl uses btrfs_end_transaction, which means it's
possible that the change will be lost if the system crashes, same for
the newly set features. Let's use btrfs_commit_transaction instead.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix assert screwup for the pending move stuff
Josef Bacik [Wed, 5 Feb 2014 21:19:21 +0000 (16:19 -0500)]
Btrfs: fix assert screwup for the pending move stuff

Wang noticed that he was failing btrfs/030 even though me and Filipe couldn't
reproduce.  Turns out this is because Wang didn't have CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT set,
which meant that a key part of Filipe's original patch was not being built in.
This appears to be a mess up with merging Filipe's patch as it does not exist in
his original patch.  Fix this by changing how we make sure del_waiting_dir_move
asserts that it did not error and take the function out of the ifdef check.
This makes btrfs/030 pass with the assert on or off.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: use late_initcall instead of module_init
Filipe David Borba Manana [Sat, 1 Feb 2014 21:27:56 +0000 (21:27 +0000)]
Btrfs: use late_initcall instead of module_init

It seems that when init_btrfs_fs() is called, crc32c/crc32c-intel might
not always be already initialized, which results in the call to crypto_alloc_shash()
returning -ENOENT, as experienced by Ahmet who reported this.

Therefore make sure init_btrfs_fs() is called after crc32c is initialized (which
is at initialization level 6, module_init), by using late_initcall (which is at
initialization level 7) instead of module_init for btrfs.

Reported-and-Tested-by: Ahmet Inan <ainan@mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: use btrfs_crc32c everywhere instead of libcrc32c
Filipe David Borba Manana [Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:06:04 +0000 (21:06 +0000)]
Btrfs: use btrfs_crc32c everywhere instead of libcrc32c

After the commit titled "Btrfs: fix btrfs boot when compiled as built-in",
LIBCRC32C requirement was removed from btrfs' Kconfig. This made it not
possible to build a kernel with btrfs enabled (either as module or built-in)
if libcrc32c is not enabled as well. So just replace all uses of libcrc32c
with the equivalent function in btrfs hash.h - btrfs_crc32c.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: disable snapshot aware defrag for now
Josef Bacik [Wed, 29 Jan 2014 21:05:30 +0000 (16:05 -0500)]
Btrfs: disable snapshot aware defrag for now

It's just broken and it's taking a lot of effort to fix it, so for now just
disable it so people can defrag in peace.  Thanks,

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix spin_unlock in check_ref_cleanup
Chris Mason [Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:02:40 +0000 (07:02 -0800)]
Btrfs: fix spin_unlock in check_ref_cleanup

Our goto out should have gone a little farther.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: setup inode location during btrfs_init_inode_locked
Chris Mason [Fri, 10 Jan 2014 01:28:00 +0000 (17:28 -0800)]
Btrfs: setup inode location during btrfs_init_inode_locked

We have a race during inode init because the BTRFS_I(inode)->location is setup
after the inode hash table lock is dropped.  btrfs_find_actor uses the location
field, so our search might not find an existing inode in the hash table if we
race with the inode init code.

This commit changes things to setup the location field sooner.  Also the find actor now
uses only the location objectid to match inodes.  For inode hashing, we just
need a unique and stable test, it doesn't have to reflect the inode numbers we
show to userland.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
10 years agoBtrfs: don't use ram_bytes for uncompressed inline items
Chris Mason [Sat, 4 Jan 2014 05:07:00 +0000 (21:07 -0800)]
Btrfs: don't use ram_bytes for uncompressed inline items

If we truncate an uncompressed inline item, ram_bytes isn't updated to reflect
the new size.  The fixe uses the size directly from the item header when
reading uncompressed inlines, and also fixes truncate to update the
size as it goes.

Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
10 years agoBtrfs: fix btrfs_search_slot_for_read backwards iteration
Filipe David Borba Manana [Sat, 11 Jan 2014 21:28:54 +0000 (21:28 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix btrfs_search_slot_for_read backwards iteration

If the current path's leaf slot is 0, we do search for the previous
leaf (via btrfs_prev_leaf) and set the new path's leaf slot to a
value corresponding to the number of items - 1 of the former leaf.
Fix this by using the slot set by btrfs_prev_leaf, decrementing it
by 1 if it's equal to the leaf's number of items.

Use of btrfs_search_slot_for_read() for backward iteration is used in
particular by the send feature, which could miss items when the input
leaf has less items than its previous leaf.

This could be reproduced by running btrfs/007 from xfstests in a loop.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: do not export ulist functions
Wang Shilong [Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:25:35 +0000 (00:25 +0800)]
Btrfs: do not export ulist functions

There are not any users that use ulist except Btrfs,don't
export them.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: rework ulist with list+rb_tree
Wang Shilong [Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:25:34 +0000 (00:25 +0800)]
Btrfs: rework ulist with list+rb_tree

We are really suffering from now ulist's implementation, some developers
gave their try, and i just gave some of my ideas for things:

 1. use list+rb_tree instead of arrary+rb_tree

 2. add cur_list to iterator rather than ulist structure.

 3. add seqnum into every node when they are added, this is
 used to do selfcheck when iterating node.

I noticed Zach Brown's comments before, long term is to kick off
ulist implementation, however, for now, we need at least avoid
arrary from ulist.

Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix memory leaks on walking backrefs failure
Wang Shilong [Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:13:38 +0000 (19:13 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix memory leaks on walking backrefs failure

When walking backrefs, we may iterate every inode's extent
and add/merge them into ulist, and the caller will free memory
from ulist.

However, if we fail to allocate inode's extents element
memory or ulist_add() fail to allocate memory, we won't
add allocated memory into ulist, and the caller won't
free some allocated memory thus memory leaks happen.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix send file hole detection leading to data corruption
Filipe David Borba Manana [Tue, 28 Jan 2014 01:38:06 +0000 (01:38 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix send file hole detection leading to data corruption

There was a case where file hole detection was incorrect and it would
cause an incremental send to override a section of a file with zeroes.

This happened in the case where between the last leaf we processed which
contained a file extent item for our current inode and the leaf we're
currently are at (and has a file extent item for our current inode) there
are only leafs containing exclusively file extent items for our current
inode, and none of them was updated since the previous send operation.
The file hole detection code would incorrectly consider the file range
covered by these leafs as a hole.

A test case for xfstests follows soon.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: add a reschedule point in btrfs_find_all_roots()
Wang Shilong [Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:32:18 +0000 (22:32 +0800)]
Btrfs: add a reschedule point in btrfs_find_all_roots()

I can easily trigger the following warnings when enabling quota
in my virtual machine(running Opensuse), Steps are firstly creating
a subvolume full of fragment extents, and then create many snapshots
(500 in my test case).

[ 2362.808459] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [btrfs-qgroup-re:1970]

[ 2362.809023] task: e4af8450 ti: e371c000 task.ti: e371c000
[ 2362.809026] EIP: 0060:[<fa38f4ae>] EFLAGS: 00000246 CPU: 0
[ 2362.809049] EIP is at __merge_refs+0x5e/0x100 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809051] EAX: 00000000 EBX: cfadbcf0 ECX: 00000000 EDX: cfadbcb0
[ 2362.809052] ESI: dd8d3370 EDI: e371dde0 EBP: e371dd6c ESP: e371dd5c
[ 2362.809054]  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
[ 2362.809055] CR0: 80050033 CR2: ac454d50 CR3: 009a9000 CR4: 001407d0
[ 2362.809099] Stack:
[ 2362.809100]  00000001 e371dde0 dfcc6890 f29f8000 e371de28 fa39016d 00000011 00000001
[ 2362.809105]  99bfc000 00000000 93928000 00000000 00000001 00000050 e371dda8 00000001
[ 2362.809109]  f3a31000 f3413000 00000001 e371ddb8 000040a8 00000202 00000000 00000023
[ 2362.809113] Call Trace:
[ 2362.809136]  [<fa39016d>] find_parent_nodes+0x34d/0x1280 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809156]  [<fa391172>] btrfs_find_all_roots+0xb2/0x110 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809174]  [<fa3934a8>] btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x358/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809180]  [<c024d0ce>] ? lock_timer_base.isra.39+0x1e/0x40
[ 2362.809199]  [<fa3648df>] worker_loop+0xff/0x470 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809204]  [<c027a88a>] ? __wake_up_locked+0x1a/0x20
[ 2362.809221]  [<fa3647e0>] ? btrfs_queue_worker+0x2b0/0x2b0 [btrfs]
[ 2362.809225]  [<c025ebbc>] kthread+0x9c/0xb0
[ 2362.809229]  [<c06b487b>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x30
[ 2362.809233]  [<c025eb20>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110

By adding a reschedule point at the end of btrfs_find_all_roots(), i no longer
hit these warnings.

Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: make send's file extent item search more efficient
Filipe David Borba Manana [Fri, 24 Jan 2014 17:42:09 +0000 (17:42 +0000)]
Btrfs: make send's file extent item search more efficient

Instead of looking for a file extent item, process it, release the path
and do a btree search for the next file extent item, just process all
file extent items in a leaf without intermediate btree searches. This way
we save cpu and we're not blocking other tasks or affecting concurrency on
the btree, because send's paths use the commit root and skip btree node/leaf
locking.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix to catch all errors when resolving indirect ref
Wang Shilong [Thu, 23 Jan 2014 05:47:49 +0000 (13:47 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix to catch all errors when resolving indirect ref

We can only tolerate ENOENT here, for other errors, we should
return directly.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix protection between walking backrefs and root deletion
Wang Shilong [Thu, 23 Jan 2014 05:47:48 +0000 (13:47 +0800)]
Btrfs: fix protection between walking backrefs and root deletion

There is a race condition between resolving indirect ref and root deletion,
and we should gurantee that root can not be destroyed to avoid accessing
broken tree here.

Here we fix it by holding @subvol_srcu, and we will release it as soon
as we have held root node lock.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: fix warning while merging two adjacent extents
Gui Hecheng [Thu, 23 Jan 2014 05:41:09 +0000 (13:41 +0800)]
btrfs: fix warning while merging two adjacent extents

When we have two adjacent extents in relink_extent_backref,
we try to merge them. When we use btrfs_search_slot to locate the
slot for the current extent, we shouldn't set "ins_len = 1",
because we will merge it into the previous extent rather than
insert a new item. Otherwise, we may happen to create a new leaf
in btrfs_search_slot and path->slot[0] will be 0. Then we try to
fetch the previous item using "path->slots[0]--", and it will cause
a warning as follows:

[  145.713385] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1796 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:5043 map_private_extent_buffer+0xd4/0xe0
[  145.713387] btrfs bad mapping eb start 5337088 len 4096, wanted 167772306 8
...
[  145.713462]  [<ffffffffa034b1f4>] map_private_extent_buffer+0xd4/0xe0
[  145.713476]  [<ffffffffa030097a>] ? btrfs_free_path+0x2a/0x40
[  145.713485]  [<ffffffffa0340864>] btrfs_get_token_64+0x64/0xf0
[  145.713498]  [<ffffffffa033472c>] relink_extent_backref+0x41c/0x820
[  145.713508]  [<ffffffffa0334d69>] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x239/0xa80

I encounter this warning when running defrag having mkfs.btrfs
with option -M. At the same time there are read/writes & snapshots
running at background.

Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send
Filipe David Borba Manana [Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:00:53 +0000 (10:00 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send

The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes
that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the
caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the
one we're currently processing) were processed.

This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change
between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory
inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became
parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop,
which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc
warning being displayed in dmesg:

  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0()
  Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid
  CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G           O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3
  Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012
  [ 5381.660441]  00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007
  [ 5381.660447]  0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0
  [ 5381.660452]  0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0
  [ 5381.660457] Call Trace:
  [ 5381.660464]  [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68
  [ 5381.660471]  [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
  [ 5381.660476]  [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
  [ 5381.660480]  [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0
  [ 5381.660487]  [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60
  [ 5381.660491]  [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440
  [ 5381.660495]  [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60
  [ 5381.660502]  [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50
  [ 5381.660508]  [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0
  [ 5381.660515]  [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0
  [ 5381.660520]  [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50
  [ 5381.660524]  [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50
  [ 5381.660530]  [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100
  [ 5381.660536]  [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230
  [ 5381.660560]  [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 5381.660564]  [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
  [ 5381.660569]  [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0
  [ 5381.660586]  [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 5381.660601]  [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs]
  [ 5381.660615]  [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs]
  [ 5381.660628]  [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs]

Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt
to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was
renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
  $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
  $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d
  $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2
  $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc
  $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
  $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send

The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is:

 .                       (ino 256)
 |-- a                   (ino 257)
     |-- b               (ino 258)
         |-- c           (ino 259)
         |   |-- d       (ino 260)
                 |
         |-- c2          (ino 261)

And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is:

 .                       (ino 256)
 |-- a                   (ino 257)
     |-- b               (ino 258)
         |-- c2          (ino 261)
             |-- d2      (ino 260)
                 |-- cc  (ino 259)

Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the
move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child
of 260.

A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agobtrfs: undo sysfs when open_ctree() fails
Anand Jain [Wed, 22 Jan 2014 03:15:51 +0000 (11:15 +0800)]
btrfs: undo sysfs when open_ctree() fails

reproducer:
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb &&\
mount /dev/sdb /btrfs &&\
btrfs dev add -f /dev/sdc /btrfs &&\
umount /btrfs &&\
wipefs -a /dev/sdc &&\
mount -o degraded /dev/sdb /btrfs
//above mount fails so try with RO
mount -o degraded,ro /dev/sdb /btrfs

------
sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/fs/btrfs/3f48c79e-5ed0-4e87-b189-86e749e503f4'
::

dump_stack+0x49/0x5e
warn_slowpath_common+0x87/0xb0
warn_slowpath_fmt+0x41/0x50
strlcat+0x69/0x80
sysfs_warn_dup+0x87/0xa0
sysfs_add_one+0x40/0x50
create_dir+0x76/0xc0
sysfs_create_dir_ns+0x7a/0xc0
kobject_add_internal+0xad/0x220
kobject_add_varg+0x38/0x60
kobject_init_and_add+0x53/0x70
mutex_lock+0x11/0x40
__free_pages+0x25/0x30
free_pages+0x41/0x50
selinux_sb_copy_data+0x14e/0x1e0
mount_fs+0x3e/0x1a0
vfs_kern_mount+0x71/0x120
do_mount+0x3f7/0x980
SyS_mount+0x8b/0xe0
system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
------

further 'modprobe -r btrfs' fails as well

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
10 years agoBtrfs: fix snprintf usage by send's gen_unique_name
Filipe David Borba Manana [Tue, 21 Jan 2014 23:36:38 +0000 (23:36 +0000)]
Btrfs: fix snprintf usage by send's gen_unique_name

The buffer size argument passed to snprintf must account for the
trailing null byte added by snprintf, and it returns a value >= then
sizeof(buffer) when the string can't fit in the buffer.

Since our buffer has a size of 64 characters, and the maximum orphan
name we can generate is 63 characters wide, we must pass 64 as the
buffer size to snprintf, and not 63.

Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>